Biden's Credit for Chip Policy and Its Implications

The recent controversy surrounding the credit for the chip policy has brought to light the differences in policy implementation and accountability between the administrations of former President Donald Trump and current President Joseph Biden. This article delves into the details of how Biden received credit for the chip policy, particularly through the passing of the Bipartisan Infrastructure and the Chip bills, while highlighting some of Trump's empty promises and insubstantial actions.

The Role of Biden in Passing the Chip Policy

Despite Trump's frequent mentions of chips and infrastructure, he did not significantly contribute to the policies that have been enacted. This is because the legislation for the chip policy, known as the CHIPS and Science Act, was passed during Biden's presidency, making it his initiative. Trump was already out of office when the bill was legislated and signed into law.

While Trump emphasized the need for infrastructure projects and placed heavy emphasis on healthcare, neither of these policy areas saw significant action from his administration. For instance, the healthcare pledges made by Trump were just that—pledges that remained unfulfilled. The actual work of implementing policies and creating lasting positive effects on the nation fell to Biden.

The CHIPS Act, which focused on enhancing US semiconductor manufacturing, was a significant step in the right direction. Unlike Trump, Biden's administration actually carried out the legislative work, ensuring that corporate taxes were permanently reduced for corporations while remaining stable for individuals and small businesses.

Debunking Trump's Promises and Biden's Success

Trump's promise to bring "manufacturing back to America" remains one of his most notable empty promises. The CHIPS Act did indeed bring chip manufacturers back to the USA, showing that Biden's administration delivered on promises that Trump never fully addressed. This policy not only brought chips manufacturing back but also aimed to enhance the overall semiconductor industry.

Trump also promised an infrastructure program. However, while he talked a lot about it, he failed to deliver significant progress. Meanwhile, Biden successfully implemented the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, which allocated substantial funding to improve infrastructure in the United States.

Healthcare was another area where Trump's promises fell short. He aimed to create a "beautiful" healthcare system but largely failed to deliver. In contrast, Biden made significant strides in healthcare reform, lowering prescription drug prices and pushing for lower insulin costs. Despite these efforts, Republican opposition has blocked some initiatives.

Trump's promise to withdraw troops from Afghanistan after a tumultuous four-year period also falls short of expectations. Despite reducing troop numbers, the Taliban controlled the country within months. Biden's administration, on the other hand, successfully completed the withdrawal of troops, believing in the stability required to ensure a successful exit strategy.

Lessons Learned and Moving Forward

This comparison of the policies and actions of the two administrations highlights the importance of following through on promises and delivering tangible results. Biden's administration has demonstrated the value of hard work and bipartisan cooperation in pushing through critical legislation.

Key takeaways include:

The difference between promises and actions: Biden's actions align with his promises, whereas Trump's campaign promises often diverged from his inaction. The importance of legislative success: Biden's actual implementation of the CHIPS Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, as opposed to Trump's predominantly rhetoric-centric approach. Accountability and credit: Biden deserves the credit for the positive changes and achievements, but it is important to recognize the work of all parties involved in shaping policy.

As the debate on policy implementation and credit continues, it is crucial to stay informed and hold the government accountable for its actions and promises. The examples of Biden and Trump illustrate the significant impact of active, accountable governance on the future of the United States.

Conclusion

The contrast between Biden and Trump's approaches to chip policy and other key areas underscores the importance of action over rhetoric. Biden's administration has demonstrated a commitment to implementing meaningful change through bipartisan efforts and legislative success. It is imperative for the public and policymakers to stay vigilant and hold leaders accountable for their promises and actions.