Why Does Boeing Have Trouble in Their Latest Planes?

The engineering challenges faced by Boeing in their latest aircraft, such as the 737 Max, can be attributed to a shift in their corporate culture and the move of their headquarters from Seattle to Chicago. This move has taken the company away from the core strengths that made their aircraft the best in the world.

Impact of Corporate Relocation

Boeing's recent troubles with their aircraft can be traced back to a significant shift in their corporate strategy. By moving their headquarters away from the traditional engineering roots, the company has distanced itself from the engineers and technical experts who would normally champion the cause of innovation and quality.

The decentralization of the team has led to a shift in priorities, with number counters taking precedence over the engineers. This was exemplified during the Max saga, where underlying engineering problems led to safety concerns. Airbus, on the other hand, has continued to innovate with new designs rather than relying on aging technology.

Addressing the Core Issues

Despite these challenges, the planes themselves aren't fundamentally flawed. The critical issues lie in the electronics and the training of pilots to use them effectively. As a software engineer myself, I would argue that the Max's problems are primarily related to the computer software, with media sensationalism adding to the overall narrative.

Engineering problems are inherent in the design and development process, requiring continuous feedback and iteration. Engineers must be able to tackle complex issues and find innovative solutions, a trait that set Boeing apart. Their ability to handle complexity and persistence in problem-solving is what defines them as engineers.

The Role of Human Mind Processing in Complex Projects

In the modern world, we often see a preference for tidiness and simplicity, which can stifle the continuous thinking and problem-solving processes required in complex engineering projects. Mothers and fathers who insist on clearing everything after playtime are, in a way, limiting the continuity of the human mind.

The human mind thrives on long, complex projects, building on what was done yesterday. Continuity is crucial for complex tasks, as it allows for the harmonious integration of different functions. However, for those who cannot handle complexity, keeping the environment tidy might provide a sense of comfort and security, albeit at the cost of achieving anything truly complex.

Conclusion

In the world of engineering, problems are inevitable, especially when dealing with complex systems. It is the perseverance and ingenuity of engineers that lead to successful products. The problems faced by Boeing are not unique; every engineering product has faced challenges during its development, manufacturing, and maintenance.

For those focused on maintaining a clean and simple lifestyle, one must recognize that there is a trade-off. The absence of complexity can lead to a less productive work environment and a more monotonous lifestyle. The solution lies in understanding the value of complexity and the importance of continuous thinking and problem-solving in engineering and other fields.