Canadian Public Reaction to Claims About Harry and Meghan's Security Costs

Recently, a false claim emerged regarding Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stating that if Prince Harry and Meghan Markle move to Canada, Canada would be responsible for their security and protection costs. This rumor has sparked mixed reactions in the Canadian public and media.

Clarification from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau

Speaking with Global News on Monday, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stated that no such conversations have taken place regarding the couple moving to Canada. Specifically, when asked about the security costs, he did not make any commitments, let alone assurances, that Canada would cover these expenses.

“An easy choice”: B.C. Charter turns down paparazzi seeking photos of Harry and Meghan’s pad

This confusion appears to have its roots in a report from the Daily Mail, an English newspaper, which is known for sensationalist headlines. It’s important to verify such claims with reliable sources, as no Canadian official, including the Prime Minister, has made such assertions.

Public Sentiment in Canada

Many Canadians have expressed a willingness to support the royal couple and cover any potential security costs if they move to Canada. Public sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, with many Canadians expressing pride in the idea of welcoming Harry and Meghan to their country. "Harry and Meghan are welcome here," one Canadian wrote, adding, "they are loved by this Canadian."

Financial Considerations

The cost of providing security to the royal couple is indeed manageable, according to Canadian financial officials. The Minister of Finance clarified that there have been no discussions about these costs, and the idea that the security costs would have to be covered by the Canadian government is seen as highly unlikely.

“Nobody will notice their taxes increase,” said one Canadian, with confidence that the security would be provided at minimal cost. The Canadian government already has a well-established system for providing security to numerous VIPs, and the addition of Prince Harry and Meghan would be a relatively minor addition.

Historical Context and Criticism

The claims about the security costs have been met with a sense of frustration in Canada. There is a growing feeling that the British people have allowed the younger royals to be chased from Britain and into a partial exile in Canada. This has led some to question the British monarchy’s approach to security and the British media’s treatment of the royal family.

“The entire episode has left a foul taste. The British people should take a good look at themselves,” said one commentator. Others have pointed out that the British press’s treatment of Meghan has been particularly rough, with criticism rooted in racism, misogyny, and classism.

Prince Harry, never forgetting the trauma his mother experienced, has been providing refuge to his wife and child from the press. This sentiment has been echoed by many Canadians who feel a strong connection to the idea of sheltering Meghan from further stress.

In conclusion, while the claims about Canada picking up the bill for Harry and Meghan’s security are unsubstantiated, the sentiment among Canadians remains supportive and positive. The public’s reaction highlights the importance of verifying information and the willingness of many Canadians to embrace the royal couple.