TechTorch

Location:HOME > Technology > content

Technology

Comparing Narendra Modi and Manmohan Singh: Governance, Economic Policies, and Public Perception

May 05, 2025Technology1296
# IntroductionBoth Narendra Modi and Manmohan Singh have made signific
# Introduction

Both Narendra Modi and Manmohan Singh have made significant impacts on Indian politics and governance. However, they represent vastly different approaches and outcomes. This article explores their shared traits and contrasts, focusing on their economic policies, public governance, and public perception.

Shared Traits: Closing Eyes While Sleeping

Interestingly, both Modi and Singh share the trait of frequently napping while in bed. This seemingly trivial similarity has deeper implications. For Modi, it often reflects his efficiency and intense focus on work. For Singh, it might signify a more relaxed and generous nature, as he was never actively involved in condemning his political allies, even when their actions were, perhaps, questionable.

Modi's Gateway to Corruption

One of the stark contrasts between the two leaders is Modi's perceived tolerance of corruption and criminal elements within his party. Modi has been more lenient with corrupt criminals, even rapists, who have been allowed into the BJP. His government even facilitated instances where a passenger could board a train from Kakinada to Thirupati without proper tickets. Such incidents have raised questions about the integrity and the direction of the BJP under his leadership.

Modi's policies have also posed challenges for BPL families. For instance, promoting schemes like 140 crores to every 2 crore opportunities or promising to return black money from Switzerland have not materialized. On the other hand, Manmohan Singh's efforts to uplift BPL families and his initiatives were more long-term and effective.

Manmohan Singh's Broad-minded Approach

While Manmohan Singh was well-intentioned and broad-minded, his policies and initiatives did not always translate to immediate results. He introduced economic reforms and liberalization policies that were widely appreciated and utilized, especially in financial matters. His initiatives did not just benefit India, but also gained recognition on an international stage through organizations like the United Nations.

During his tenure, Singh also handled economic challenges with a steady hand. The Congress and United Progressive Alliance (UPA) aligned with him managed to handle critical issues effectively, even when dealing with senior Congress members and coalition partners whose interests were often conflicting. Singh's focus on financial stability and good governance garnered respect and admiration from around the world.

Public Governance and Corruption

Public governance and corruption have been controversial topics under both leaders. Manmohan Singh's approach was more transparent and responsible, even during his time in a cabinet where corruption was rampant. He was not shy to criticize his closest allies, despite his broad-minded nature. However, Modi's approach to good governance and transparency has been questioned. For example, the BJP's allocation of 5 kg rice and 1 kg being stolen showcase a lack of accountability and transparency in governance.

Despite this, Modi's focus on marketing and event management has been outstanding. While this has resulted in impressive slogans and propaganda, it has diverted attention from pressing issues like inflation, fuel prices, and other burning concerns. The lack of public outcry against corruption and lack of convictions in trial courts under the current government has further raised questions about the effectiveness and integrity of Modi's administration.

Conclusion

The differences between Narendra Modi and Manmohan Singh are multifaceted. Modi's focus on national security and economic development has been admirable, but his leniency towards corruption and his lack of transparency in governance raise questions. On the other hand, Singh's broad-minded approach and economic reforms have laid a solid foundation for stability and international recognition. However, the public continues to grapple with issues such as farmers' suicides and economic hardships.