Critical Analysis of MTech in Control and Automation at NIT Rourkela

Every year, approximately 50 students leave the NIT Rourkela's Control and Automation branch, citing a multitude of issues. This article critically examines the quality of the MTech in Control and Automation program, focusing on factors such as faculty infrastructure, institute reputation, and student outcomes. Based on personal experiences and anonymous feedback, the article provides a comprehensive analysis of the programme's strengths and drawbacks.

The State of Faculty and Infrastructure

The faculty and infrastructure at the NIT Rourkela's Control and Automation branch are deeply concerning. A common complaint is the frequent unavailability of the professor for classes, with some professors conducting classes only when students actively seek them out. This absence is particularly detrimental as practical lab sessions are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the subject. For instance, a respected department specializing in Advanced Power Electronics reports that no professors are willing to conduct labs, which is a significant drawback for students aiming for hands-on experience.

Furthermore, the placement scenario is abysmal. The absence of any job opportunities and career prospects further compounds the issues for students. Many students leave the college due to a lack of job readiness and support from the institution. This is detrimental to their personal and professional development.

Personal Experiences and Incidents

My experience in a particular batch mirrors the larger narrative. Out of the 23 admitted students, only 12 were present in the second year. The reasons for students leaving are largely due to the quality of education and the availability of resources, which are sorely lacking. It is strongly advised to avoid joining this college if you prioritize academic and career growth.

Several incidents highlight the poor quality of teaching. For example, one professor who teaches Advanced Power Electronics often does not adhere to the scheduled timings and requires students to invite him for the classes. This is not a one-time issue but a recurring problem. Additionally, rumors and allegations about the director and head of the department (HoD) are common, with accusations of incompetence and favoritism.

Other professors, like those in the ESC (Electrical System Control) specialization, also face scrutiny. An incident involving a Ph.D. student of the HoD led to biased marking, affecting the grades of other students. Similarly, a renowned professor in PED (Power Electronics and Drives) is criticized for his lack of knowledge and repetitive teaching style, despite holding a high-paying job.

In the CA (Control and Automation) specialty, only one professor is highly appreciated for his teaching, but the associated teaching assistant is reportedly unintelligent and unhelpful. This has raised concerns about the overall quality of education and the importance of staff beyond mere supervision.

Pros and Cons

While the program does offer a 14k monthly stipend and the convenience of being a MHRD Tier-I degree holder, these perks are outweighed by the numerous drawbacks. Students often feel that they learn very little and that the professors are more focused on political maneuvering than actual teaching.

Key takeaways:

The department and faculty are often seen as tools for political games, leading to a suboptimal learning environment. The director and HoD are described as incompetent and a hindrance to the students' progress.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the MTech in Control and Automation at NIT Rourkela is marred by significant shortcomings. The quality of education, faculty availability, and lack of job opportunities are major deterrents. Prospects for academic and professional growth are severely limited, making it a poor choice for students seeking a robust educational experience and a promising career.