Criticism Against the Modi Government: Evaluating the Context and Public Demand for Accountability

The sudden upsurge in questions against the Modi government and its major policy decisions has raised several valid concerns, particularly in light of the current economic challenges facing India. This article delves into the reasons behind this criticism while highlighting the role of public scrutiny in a democratic system.

Context of Economic Slump and Policy Criticism

The primary trigger for the recent criticism against the Modi government and its policies is the ongoing economic slowdown. This includes issues like mass unemployment, falling demand for consumer goods, farmer distress, and the looming recession. When citizens experience economic hardship, they naturally blame the current administration for the economic downturn. However, it is important to recognize that this does not necessarily mean people are willing to forget the corruption of the previous government. On the contrary, they are becoming more aware that the perceived corruption from the past might have been exaggerated and that the current administration has been more transparent about its initiatives and programs.

Public Scrutiny and Its Role

Public scrutiny plays a vital role in any democracy. In the Indian context, the current system relies on three main authorities to check the government's actions: the opposition in Parliament, the press, and the public. Unfortunately, the opposition in Parliament is often weak, and the press is sometimes biased. As a result, the onus often falls on the public to keep raising tough questions and prevent the rise of authoritarian tendencies.

Comparison Between UPA and NDA Governments

Some critics argue that the criticism against the Modi government is because people remember the corruption in the UPA (United Progressive Alliance) government. They highlight that there were no convictions of high profile corruption cases during the UPA rule. They ask, 'Is the current government any better in terms of implementing its programs and schemes?' In fact, the perception of corruption in the UPA government was often exaggerated. People are now more aware and questioning the implementation of policies despite the abundance of schemes and programs being announced.

Instances of Public Accountability

There are instances where the public has effectively tightened the reins on the government. For example, in recent Gujarat elections, although the Congress did not receive a clear mandate, the public's interest in holding the BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party) accountable was evident. This prevented the BJP from advancing unchecked. Such instances indicate that when the public is vigilant, it can significantly influence the government's actions.

Conclusion: A Call for Responsible Public Engagement

These events are good signs for the country, indicating that the government of a democratic nation is a reflection of its public. A responsible and educated populace ensures that the government operates with transparency and accountability. Therefore, it is essential to foster a culture where citizens critically evaluate their government's actions rather than blindly criticizing or blindly supporting it.

So, let us cheer up and embrace the challenges and opportunities that come with a robust democratic system.