Introduction to the Challenges of Electronic Voting Machines

In recent election cycles, the use of electronic voting machines has become a contentious issue. With an overwhelming majority (80%) of these machines being owned by just two major companies, Diebold and Election Systems Software, the reliability and security of these systems have come under intense scrutiny. This article delves into the challenges and vulnerabilities associated with these machines, particularly their potential for remote hacking, and the implications for the legitimacy of recent elections.

Ownership and Security Concerns

According to reports, the vast majority of electronic voting machines used in the United States are leased or owned by private companies, mainly Diebold and Election Systems Software. These companies have exclusive control over the machines, which leaves the election commission with limited oversight. Importantly, these machines are not government property but are owned by these private companies, making them susceptible to various security breaches.

Remote Hacking Vulnerabilities

There have been numerous reports and videos on YouTube demonstrating how easily these machines can be remotely hacked. The Central Processing Units (CPUs) within the voting machines are key targets for such hacking attempts. The ease with which these systems can be compromised raises serious concerns about the integrity of the voting process.

The Implications for Election Legitimacy

The use of these systems in recent elections has sparked debates about the legitimacy of results. Given the lack of transparency and the potential for remote hacking, it is challenging to assert the absolute fairness of the election outcomes. This lingering doubt has significant implications for the trust and confidence in our democratic processes.

Conclusion: A Call for Transparency and Security

As we continue to rely on electronic voting machines, it is crucial to consider the security measures in place and the potential vulnerabilities. While these systems offer certain conveniences, addressing the concerns around their ownership, security, and remote hacking is imperative. Greater transparency and robust security measures are necessary to ensure the continued trust in our electoral processes.

Additional Reading and Resources

For a deeper understanding of the issues surrounding electronic voting, consider exploring the following resources:

Academic papers and reports on Election Systems Software and Diebold's voting machines. Government and independent audit reports on electronic voting systems. Articles and blogs discussing the potential vulnerabilities of these systems.