Did the U.S. Administration Fund and Support ISIS?

The allegations surrounding U.S. support for the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) have stirred heated debates and claims of deep-seated ulterior motives behind U.S. foreign policy. The U.S. policy of 'supporting one bad guy against the other' has been a cornerstone of U.S. global strategy, which critics argue has resulted in unintended and disastrous consequences, such as the rise of Islamist extremist groups like ISIS.

The Role of the CIA and the Support for Subversive Groups

The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has historically played a crucial role in enabling the activities of various insurgent groups around the world. These groups have often been financed and armed with the underlying intention of overthrowing or destabilizing regimes seen as unfriendly to U.S. interests. One such example is the Syrian conflict, where the U.S. and its allies provided significant financial and military assistance to opposition groups in an attempt to overthrow Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

U.S. Support for Subversive Groups in Syria

According to Seymour Hersh's report in the London Times, the CIA looted Libyan armories and smuggled weapons through Turkey into Syria. These arms were then distributed through murky deals, some of which benefited groups including ISIS. Once armed and positioned, ISIS began to question the rationale of aiding the U.S. effort to topple the Assad government. They saw an opportunity to establish their own caliphate, leading them to capture the city of Mosul and loot U.S.-supplied armories in Iraq.

Wahhabi Jihadi Groups and Saudi Arabia's Role

The U.S. also funded Wahhabi jihadis, who were allies in the fight against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. However, after the fall of the USSR, these same groups turned against the U.S. and became its enemies, an ironic twist in the complex web of alliances and conflict.

Controversies and Denials

Despite the growing body of evidence and reports, many Americans remain skeptical of such claims. U.S. propaganda, often disseminated through news outlets that are heavily criticized for their bias, have maintained a steadfast narrative of the U.S. as the 'land of the free' and a shining beacon of hope and justice. This narrative is further entrenched in the hearts of the American public, who find it difficult to believe that their country would engage in such morally dubious actions.

Further Exposes and the Implications

While many reports suggest a clear connection between U.S. support and the rise of ISIS, the exact extent of U.S. involvement remains a matter of speculation and controversy. One such connection links the increased funding of the then-largely covert CIA to a slush fund that was administered by the agency. This fund may have been used to support various subversive groups, including those that would eventually form ISIS. A detailed analysis of this funding can be found in the related answer provided by RobertBob Herrschaft, which delves into the intricacies of the funding and support mechanisms.

Conclusion

While it is true that the U.S. administration has at times funded and supported insurgent groups around the world, the case of ISIS presents a complex and controversial situation. The U.S. has long supported various factions in the pursuit of strategic interests, an approach that has sometimes led to unintended consequences. Whether the support for ISIS was direct, indirect, or merely a result of the murky geopolitical landscape, the connection remains a subject of intense debate and investigation.

As we move forward, it is crucial to seek the objective truth. Public discourse must focus on ensuring transparency and accountability in U.S. foreign policy, especially in regions where the consequences of such policies can have far-reaching and devastating effects. The long-term objective should be to build a more just and stable world, where the actions and intentions of powerful nations align with the greater good of global stability and peace.