Introduction to the Debate on Unfair Voting Systems

The discussion on whether the current voting system is fair or not has sparked significant debates, often highlighting specific instances where the system fell short. One such instance involves the Republican-tilted claims of widespread voter fraud, led by figures like Donald J. Trump and the Cronies Criminal group. Despite assertions of voter fraud, investigations by Homeland Security have shown the 2020 election to be the most secure ever conducted in the United States. This debate, however, reflects a broader concern: the perception of unfairness varies among individuals.

Defining Unfairness in Voting Systems

Unfairness in the context of voting systems is subjective. What one person considers undue advantage, another might view as necessary protection. For instance, preventing certain individuals from voting is often seen as unfair, whereas ensuring that opposition parties can observe the process might not be universally viewed the same way. This subjective nature makes it challenging to forge a consensus on the most unfair voting system.

Control over Voting Rights and Frequency

Among the most egregious forms of unfairness in voting systems is the lack of control over who votes and how frequently they cast their ballots. When voting is unrestricted, it can lead to skewed results and misrepresentative outcomes. This could be further exacerbated by systems that allow for multiple voting, either through duplicate IDs or other fraudulent means, leading to an undemocratic process.

Ranked Choice Voting

Another aspect of voting systems that is often contested is ranked choice voting. This system allows for a more nuanced representation of voter preferences, enabling a less popular candidate to win the election. While some see this as fairer representation, others may argue that it dilutes the importance of a straightforward majority vote.

Democratic Frauds and External Influences

A particularly concerning issue is the possibility of democrats manufacturing millions of counterfeit ballots using drop boxes, or similar mechanisms. This undermines the sanctity of the voting process and casts doubt on the integrity of the electoral outcome. Additionally, systems in other authoritarian nations like Iran and Russia, where incumbent politicians can manipulate the system through illegal means such as jailing or violently silencing opponents, are far from fair.

The Flaws of the U.S. Electoral College

Perhaps the most contentious voting system in the U.S. is the Electoral College. This system was originally designed to ensure slaveholders in the Southern states retained extra political power. After the abolition of slavery, this system has remained largely unchanged, despite calls for reform. The Electoral College can lead to scenarios where the candidate who lost the popular vote still becomes President, as was the case in the 2000 and 2016 elections.

No Accountability for Voting Behavior

Another significant issue is the lack of accountability in the voting process. Without proper verification and oversight, it is difficult to ensure that only eligible voters cast their ballots and that the voting process remains transparent. This can create a false sense of choice and outcome, making the whole process suspect and potentially leading to corruption and distrust in the electoral system.

Conclusion: Rethinking Democratic Voting Systems

Ultimately, the goal of any voting system should be to ensure a fair and transparent democratic process. Reforms might include measures such as ranked choice voting, increased transparency, and robust measures against voter fraud. By addressing these issues, we can move closer to a more equitable and just electoral system that truly represents the will of the people.