Why Are Flat Earthers Missed the Obvious Proofs?

Flat Earthers, often criticized for their Flat Earth theory, have a deep belief in the flatness of the Earth despite overwhelming evidence for a spherical one. Instead of opting for simpler, more accessible proofs to support their hypothesis, flat earthers often attempt more complex tasks, such as going into space to prove their point. However, the question remains: Why are these individuals not exploring more obvious and achievable methods, such as sailing to the edge of Antarctica or proving the visibility of Polaris in the Southern Hemisphere?

The Antarctic Treaty and the Challenge of Sailing to the Edge

One of the most intriguing challenges for flat earthers is the Antarctic treaty. Signed in the late 1950s, it designates the continent of Antarctica as a wildlife and oceanic reserve, open only to scientific study. While there is a common misconception that no one can sail close to the edge due to military restrictions, several countries have authorized teams to live year-round. These teams are not permitted to travel more than 10 miles from their base unless militarily authorized. Any unauthorized travel can result in arrest or, in extreme cases, shooting. This makes it extremely difficult for flat earthers to test their hypotheses by simply sailing to the edge.

Despite these regulations, some flat earthers have attempted to challenge the rules. However, such attempts often fail. We often hear about plans to shoot themselves up into space in homemade rockets, but these plans often fall through before launch, hinting that the idea of the launch may have been a myth to garner attention. Similarly, proposals to travel to the edge of Antarctica often face disappointment when they find out that they can book tourist trips by ship, plane, or even a combination, all while remaining within the bounds of regulated areas.

The Unsolved Mystery of Polaris Visibility

A key claim made by critics of the Flat Earth theory is the visibility of Polaris in the Southern Hemisphere. In his 1850s work, the proponent of the Flat Earth theory, Samuel Rowbotham, claimed that Polaris could be seen well into the Southern Hemisphere and at least as far as the Tropic of Capricorn. However, with a lifetime of experience in the Southern Hemisphere, it is clear that this claim is utterly false. Despite numerous opportunities to provide proof, flat earthers have failed to provide any substantial evidence.

Numerous flat earthers claim to live in the Southern Hemisphere, and yet, no one has managed to capture photographs or certified observations of Polaris south of the equator. Over the past 160 years, the cost to gather such evidence would be minuscule when compared to many other potential projects. The relative ease of obtaining such proof should be a cause for urgency, but the flat earthers' silence is deafening. Where is the innovation and scientific curiosity that one might expect from a group claiming to challenge established scientific facts?

The Flat Earthers: A Problem of Credibility

The flat earthers often propose elaborate adventures, such as going to the edge of the world, in hopes of proving their point. However, when presented with the possibility of simple and cost-effective solutions, they remain silent. This inaction raises serious questions about the credibility of the flat earthers. They talk a lot about adventures and expeditions, but when faced with the opportunity to provide concrete proof, they fall short.

The lack of any tangible proof, especially in light of the vast resources available, makes it challenging to take their claims seriously. If they were truly committed to their beliefs, they would provide irrefutable evidence. Instead, they seem to be more interested in creating buzz and drawing attention rather than providing substantial proof.

In conclusion, the flat earthers' refusal to pursue simple and accessible methods to prove their theories raises significant doubts about the validity of their claims. While space travel and venturing to the edge of the continent might be exciting, the absence of more straightforward and affordable solutions points to a lack of genuine scientific curiosity and credibility.

Keywords: Flat Earth theory, Antarctic treaty, Polaris