Has Narendra Modi Abandoned the Image of a People-Centric Leader?

In the ongoing Indian parliamentary proceedings, a critical question looms large: has Prime Minister Narendra Modi abandoned the image of a people-centric leader in favor of a more elitist and less respectful approach towards the opposition? This shift in demeanor has not gone unnoticed, as highlighted by recent events and the growing unrest among his own supporters. Let us delve into the nuances of this transformation and its implications on Modi's standing as a leader.

Modi's Approach to Opposition Members

One of the most significant shifts in Modi's approach is his increasing reluctance to engage respectfully with opposition members. This change was evident during recent parliamentary proceedings where Modi's interactions with opposition leaders were marked by evasiveness and a dismissive attitude. This has not only weakened his own credibility but also raised concerns about his leadership style.

KK's victory in the recent polls was a clear message from the electorate, yet Modi's behavior has shown no sign of an attitudinal shift. Instead, he has seemed overly concerned with projecting an image of self-importance and machismo. This approach conflicts with the image of an ordinary street guy who was given power to serve the people, not to engage in demagoguery. Modi's failure to respect and listen to the opposition is a serious drawback in his leadership.

Manipulur Crisis and International Perception

The handling of the Manipur crisis has also drawn significant criticism. While the crisis became a global concern, Modi's absence and lack of immediate response were noted. This only serves to reinforce the perception that Modi prioritizes international diplomacy over the domestic concerns of his citizens. Leaders like Emmanuel Macron have shown a stark contrast in their commitment to their people's affairs, with Macron cancelling international visits to deal with domestic emergencies.

During the Coramandal Triangle accident and the Manipur riots, Modi's absence was particularly scrutinized. Instead of returning from his overseas trips, he continued to spend time in tourist locations abroad, raising questions about his priorities and commitment to governance.

The Impact of Modi's Behavior on International Relations

Modi's frequent international travels and his attempts to project an image of a global player have faced backlash. While he aims to elevate India's status and bring in technological advancements, the reality is that such actions alone will not ensure respect and recognition from the international community. The real source of respect for leaders lies in their governance, not in their networking with superpowers.

Moreover, Modi's actions and his government's treatment of international fugitives have drawn criticism. While Israel is far more powerful than India and can capture fugitives without providing any information to the countries where they are caught, why cannot India do the same? This highlights the perceived hypocrisy in Modi's approach to justice and international cooperation.

The Opposition's Response and the Namo Bakth Factor

The opposition's reaction to these moves has been noteworthy. They have criticized Modi's attitude and called for a more respectful and cooperative approach. The recent proceedings on the NC motion have also highlighted the potential for a shift within the Namo Bakth group, as some have moved on from their support, possibly due to a decline in Modi's popularity.

Shah's speech during the proceedings was more aligned with the opposition's narrative, emphasizing the consultation and communication during the Manipur unrest. He acknowledged the efforts of various stakeholders, including law enforcement and senior officials, but ultimately absolved Modi of any direct involvement, which is a stark contrast to the opposition's claims.

Modi's closing remarks, which avoided addressing the epithets 'Kubakarna' and 'Dhritarashtra,' were seen as a calculated move to avoid further controversy. However, this approach may only exacerbate his image as a 'big brother,' leading to further resentment among opposition leaders and voters.

Conclusion

As India faces numerous domestic and international challenges, Modi's approach to governance is under intense scrutiny. His reluctance to engage respectfully with the opposition, his handling of the Manipur crisis, and his international travels have all contributed to a perception of a less people-centric leadership. To regain the trust of his constituents and to ensure effective governance, Modi must prioritize respect, cooperation, and a genuine commitment to his people's welfare.

With the upcoming 2024 elections approaching, the discourse around Modi's image and effectiveness will be crucial. The challenges of balancing international aspirations with domestic responsibilities will be key to maintaining his leadership and ensuring India's progress.