Is Arnab Goswami Worth Watching for His Debate Shows?

Arnab Goswami, a prominent figure in the world of Indian journalism, has received both praise and criticism for his hosting style. Many viewers, including myself, have mixed feelings about his shows, particularly his debate segments on shows likeThe Arnab Goswami Showon Times Now. This article explores whether Arnab Goswami's style of journalism is worth your time, focusing on his debating skills, fairness, and overall impact on viewers.

Arnab Goswami's Knowledge and Influence

;Arnab Goswamiis undoubtedly well-informed and highly knowledgeable about current events and news. He has established himself as one of the best anchors in the industry, thanks to his thorough preparation and extensive expertise. His shows often inform the public with detailed analysis and insights, which are valuable in a rapidly changing world.

Flaws in His Debatting Style

However, despite his knowledge and preparation, Arnab Goswami's debating style often falls short in several key areas. His tendency to lose his temper and become agitated during debates can detract from the overall quality of the conversation. This is especially true when he invites panelists with diametrically opposing views, as he often ends up in confrontational arguments rather than productive discussions.

Another significant issue is Arnab Goswami's bias towards the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). He frequently exposes his political alignment by silencing or humiliating invitees who are from other political parties, such as the Congress. This one-sided approach often leads to a less balanced and informative debate, which can be off-putting to viewers who value truth and fairness in journalism.

Furthermore, Arnab Goswami's style of questioning can be overwhelming for his invited guests. He often interrupts and challenges panelists without giving them a fair chance to express their opinions. This method may be intended to provoke reactions, but it often results in chaos and a lack of substantive discussion. The show frequently ends up looking more like a dog fight or cock fight than a genuine debate, where all viewpoints could be explored.

Alternatives and Better Anchors

While Arnab Goswami is undoubtedly the best anchor in terms of knowledge and preparation, there are other hosts who may offer a more balanced and engaging experience. For instance, Rajat Sharma, Sudhir Choudhary, and Deepak Chaurasiya are recognized for their professionalism and fair approach.

It's interesting to note that the preference for debate shows is not just limited to Indian anchors. Some viewers, even with a preference for one political leaning, may still opt to watch debate segments to critique and challenge the discourse. However, the overwhelming consensus is that these shows are not worth watching for their current format and the biased nature of the debates.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while Arnab Goswami has the aura and knowledge to be a great anchor, his debating style often falls short in delivering a balanced and informative discussion. The one-sided nature of his debates and his bias towards certain political viewpoints make these shows less valuable to most viewers. Those looking for truly neutral and unbiased discussions might want to consider alternative sources or those that prioritize the free exchange of ideas.