Technology
Is Escaped Inmate Punishment Justified: An Insider’s Perspective
Is Escaped Inmate Punishment Justified: An Insider’s Perspective
Convicted individuals who manage to escape from jail or prison often face additional jail time on top of their original sentences. But does this constitute a fair and just punishment? This article delves into the rationale behind additional sentencing for escapees, drawing from an insider's perspective. With over 17 years in various correctional facilities and personal experience with three escapes, the author shares his insights on the likelihood of escapes and the impact of additional sentences.
Insider's Perspective on Prisons and Escapes
According to Captain E, serving time and contemplating escape is not a common occurrence among inmates. He emphasizes that human nature often dictates that escapees will face repercussions when they break other laws during their escape attempts. Following the escape, he mentions, charges are typically leveled against the individual, and any additional time served is added to their original sentence.
Chances of Successful Escape without Outside Help
Based on Captain E's extensive experience in various prisons, the chances of an inmate escaping without external assistance are extremely low. He notes that if an inmate successfully escapes, it is often due to pre-existing factors such as life sentences or verified mental health issues.
Consequences of Escaping Inmate
Escaping from prison is no small feat and carries severe consequences. Captain E shares his own experiences, highlighting the challenges and additional time he faced following his escapes. For example, after his first escape, he was given an additional six months in prison and was transferred to a more secure facility. On his second escape, he received an extra three years, along with time in a work farm where he eventually stole a work truck. The consequences were severe, with an additional three years in prison and time served for theft.
The Nature of Escaping Inmates
Escaping from prison does not reflect well on the inmate's character. Captain E notes that many escapees face life sentences and have nothing to lose, or they deal with verified mental health problems. He provides a case study of David Sweat, who received an additional 14 years in his life sentence but was ultimately placed in solitary confinement.
Effect of Additional Sentencing on Parole Eligibility
Additional sentencing for escapees often removes any chance of parole, especially for those serving life sentences. Captain E points out that adding time to a life sentence can eliminate the possibility of ever leaving prison. He concludes that the additional time is justified as a deterrent to further rule violations and a reflection of the inmate's unwillingness to follow social morals.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the decision to impose additional sentencing for escapees is often seen as fair, it is crucial to consider the context and consequences. Escaping is a serious offense that reflects a lack of adherence to rules and social morals. However, it is equally important to recognize that the prison system needs to provide appropriate resources and support to prevent escapes and to rehabilitate offenders effectively.