Is the M60 Patton Tank Still Useable in Modern Warfare?

The M60 Patton, first introduced in the late 1950s, has largely been phased out of frontline service in most modern militaries, replaced by more advanced tanks like the M1 Abrams and Leopard 2. However, the M60 still holds a place in certain contexts, particularly in less conventional warfare or in nations with limited resources.

Considerations for Current Use

While the M60 is no longer the cutting-edge technology it once was, several factors make it a viable option for specific roles and contexts:

Upgrades

Some M60s have been given modern upgrades, including improved armor, fire control systems, and weaponry. These enhancements can significantly boost their effectiveness on the battlefield, making them more than just relics of the past. For example, the M60-2000, produced by General Dynamics and featuring many upgrades similar to the Abrams, offers a cost-effective solution for nations with limited budgets.

Role

The M60 could serve in secondary roles such as support or training. In countries that don't have access to more advanced systems, an M60 might be the best available option. For instance, the M728 Combat Engineer Vehicle is a modified version of the M60 chassis, still in use for engineering duties in the U.S. military.

Limitations

Despite upgrades, the M60's armor and firepower are outdated compared to contemporary main battle tanks. It would be at a significant disadvantage against modern anti-tank weapons and armor. In high-intensity conflicts against modern armies, the M60 would likely be ineffective.

Operational Context

In low-intensity conflicts or against less sophisticated opponents, the M60 might still be viable. For example, several countries, including Israel, have upgraded versions of the M60 chassis tanks, such as the Sabra. In these contexts, the M60 could provide a practical and cost-effective solution.

Cost-Effectiveness

For nations with budget constraints, maintaining and upgrading existing M60s might be more cost-effective than acquiring new tanks. General Dynamics, which owns the rights to all U.S. tanks from 1940 to the present, produces a version of the M60 with many upgrades at a much cheaper price point than the Abrams.

My personal experience as an active US Army Armor soldier until 2009 provides insights into how the M60 has been adapted for other roles. For instance, the M60 chassis is still in use as the M728 Combat Engineer Vehicle, serving in an infantry support capacity.

However, no first or second-tier combatant nation would or should use major front-line equipment that is 2–3 generations obsolete. A nation using only M60s would lose all their tanks quickly if they fought a war with any second or first-tier country. Therefore, while the M60 has its place in specific roles and contexts, it is essential to understand its limitations in modern warfare.

Overall, the M60 Patton could technically still be used in certain contexts, but its effectiveness would be limited compared to modern armored vehicles and it would primarily be suitable for specific roles and contexts.