Legal Obligations and Drones Over Private Property: A Case Study in Oklahoma

Can you legally shoot down a drone that hovers over your property in Oklahoma? The short answer is no. Doing so would not only land you in legal trouble but also put you at significant personal risk. This article explores the legal framework in place and provides valuable insights based on an extensive career in security and bank safety.

Understanding the Legal Framework

While many homeowners and property owners may feel a sense of urgency and personal security when a drone is hovering over their land, it is crucial to understand that shooting down a drone is not an appropriate course of action. In the United States, airspace does not belong to the landowner, and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) governs all airspace.

Case Study: Drones Over Airports and Properties

As someone who has been involved in various security and banking sectors for over 21 years, I have encountered numerous situations where drones have been a concern, particularly in proximity to airports. Living in Oklahoma, which has a significant number of airports and military bases, I have firsthand experience with the potential risks drones can pose.

Emerging Trends and Risks

Jet planes, WWII bombers, and helicopters have been a common sight in the skies above my home and rural areas in Oklahoma. Given this context, encountering a drone is not unusual. When faced with a drone near my property, my immediate actions are to call Air Traffic Control (ATC) and, as a last resort, 911. The rationale is to ensure the drone's pilot takes appropriate actions in a controlled manner.

Employing Common Sense and Precautions

While the issue of shooting down a drone remains a topic of concern, employing common sense and taking necessary precautions is key. The presence of a drone does not necessitate the use of force, especially given the potential legal ramifications and personal risks involved. An alternative approach is to contact local authorities to address the issue.

Historical Perspective: A Personal Anecdote

During my career, I had the opportunity to engage with an individual who was concerned about "black helicopters" flying over their backyard in Riverside, California. This incident highlights the importance of understanding the legal boundaries and the potential consequences of taking unnecessary actions.

The Incident and Lessons Learned

This individual went so far as to fire on a law enforcement helicopter supporting a felony arrest. This action led to his arrest and charges. His subsequent complaint to the FBI only resulted in further scrutiny and legal complications. This case serves as a stark reminder of the risks associated with acting on irrational fears and misconceptions about airspace.

Insights from Professional Experience

Over the years, I have gained valuable insights into the complexities of airspace control and the importance of adhering to legal norms. For example, 21 years ago, I was present in the FBI office in Los Angeles when an individual was concerned about "Black Helicopters." This experience highlighted the need for calm and rational responses to perceived threats.

Professional Involvement in Banking and Security

My extensive experience in banking security has led me to witness various instances, including the nightly lockup of documents that created The United States. These experiences underscore the significance of following legal and safety protocols.

Conclusion

In summary, the legal obligations surrounding drones over private property in Oklahoma, and indeed across the United States, are clear. While the temptation to take action may be strong, it is essential to prioritize legal compliance and personal safety. Shooting down a drone is not only illegal but also poses significant risks. Instead, contacting relevant authorities and using common sense approaches are the most effective strategies.