Nations' Control Over the Internet: A Necessary Measure or an Act of Censorship?

In today’s increasingly socially divisive reality, the question of whether nations should control their own Internet is becoming more pressing. The idea of national control over the Internet might seem to counter the global interconnectedness that I often advocate for, but in reality, it is not so.

Global Interconnectedness and Its Challenges

The global Internet we have created has become a mirror of our corrupt egoistic attitudes towards each other. Instead of serving as a platform that we use to better our human relations, it has become a marketplace where we each go to either blabber about whatever is on our minds or use it to profit off of others. In order to realize our growing global technological interconnectedness positively, it needs to be accompanied by a form of education that upgrades our attitudes to each other.

National Sovereignty and Protectionist Measures

By failing to implement such connection-enriching learning, the global Internet becomes a breeding ground for hatred and divisiveness. This is why nations, including Russia, are making protectionist motions such as closing off the Internet. Instead of positive relations spreading throughout the Internet, we see a proliferation of hatred and divisiveness, which definitely becomes better to shut off.

Russia’s Stance: Protecting the Inner Internet from Foreign Threats

Russia is not going to leave the World Wide Web (WWW). What they are doing is trying to protect their own inner Internet from foreign threats. This move is not an act of censorship but rather a measure to ensure the safety and privacy of its citizens from external influences.

The True Intentions Behind Internet Control

Are they trying to avoid surveillance, control the content, or something else? The true intentions behind such measures are multifaceted. Firstly, it is about ensuring the privacy and security of the nation and its citizens. Secondly, it is about maintaining cultural and national identity, as an open Internet could expose citizens to external influences that may not align with their values and norms.

Conclusion

While the idea of national control over the Internet might seem restrictive, it is a necessary measure in a world where the global Internet has become a mirror of our societal issues. It is a step towards creating a more harmonious and inclusive online space that benefits all. The challenge lies in achieving a balance between national sovereignty and global interdependence. We need to work towards a global Internet that serves increasing positive human connections and avoids the negativity and divisiveness that has become prevalent.