Respect for Medical Equipment Among Inmates

The use and handling of medical equipment by inmates can be a complex issue. Inmates, for the most part, tend to show a level of respect for devices that are essential to their well-being and those of their fellow detainees. However, there are scenarios that challenge this respect and highlight instances of carelessness, vandalism, or outright theft.

Introduction to Medical Equipment Use

During my incarceration, I was granted the use of a cane after undergoing total hip replacement surgery. The cane was a substantial piece of cherry hardwood, comparable in heft to a baseball bat. Although I requested a less intimidating alternative, the sheriff's department was concerned about the potential misuse of hollow-tube canes, hence the solid hardwood option.

My fellow inmates were initially fascinated by my cane. I encouraged them to inspect it, making it clear that I had no intention of using it to smuggle contraband or as a weapon. The camaraderie among detainees is already tenuous, so I was careful to foster a sense of trust and respect.

Maintaining Respect in Medical Device Handling

Most inmates with wheelchairs were amiable and got along well with others. Wheelchairs, being sturdy, were rarely targeted. If anyone attempted to steal or damage a wheelchair, it would be straightforward to determine the culprit. There was a notable instance of horseplay with crutches, but nothing serious enough to warrant attention.

The Case of Crazy Dave

However, there were exceptions to the rule. Crazy Dave, a universally disliked inmate with a CPAP machine, was a notorious instigator. His incessant whining and tendency to escalate conflicts often led to his devices being targeted. The staff would provide him with every available piece of equipment to avoid his constant complaints. Even during the presence of a new female CO, Crazy Dave would attempt to feign a heart attack to gain attention.

One notable incident involved the theft of the hose from Dave's CPAP machine. It was discovered later in the showers, contaminated with an unknown substance. Another, more cunning attack involved a needle used to pierce numerous holes in the hose, rendering it ineffective. Dave's antics and prolonged retaliation against the staff further escalated these incidents.

Medical Equipment Security and Vandalism

Another vulnerable piece of equipment was the walker. While some inmates, like Dave, had legitimate reasons to use one, others merely wanted a place to rest while waiting in line for commissary or to be part of the hypochondriac community. This resulted in multiple episodes where screws on the walker were tampered with or the legs adjusted to different heights.

Interestingly, Crazy Dave’s CPAP machine served as a prime target. The machine’s loud noise made it unpopular among inmates, but causing damage to it would only result in the inmate snoring louder—an undesirable outcome. However, Dave did receive a walker, which he would place in the common area of his pod. It was often left unattended and was frequently tampered with by other inmates.

Conclusion

Despite these incidents, instances of outright disrespect towards medical equipment are relatively rare. Most inmates attempt to maintain a modicum of respect due to the inherent trust and the shared understanding of the importance of these devices for their well-being. However, the presence of notorious individuals such as Crazy Dave can disrupt this general trend, leading to targeted attacks and vandalism.