Do You Agree with Steven Hawking's Theory about a Parallel Earth Known as the Multiverse?

The concept of the multiverse, described by prominent physicist Stephen Hawking and others, has sparked intense debate among scientists, philosophers, and the general public. While some find the idea compelling, many argue against it, suggesting that it is more about fantasy than science.

Scientific Evidence and the Multiverse

One of the primary arguments against the multiverse theory is the lack of empirical evidence. Science relies on observable facts and repeatable experiments. The multiverse posits the existence of multiple universes beyond our observation, making it difficult to verify or falsify. As Hawking himself stated, 'Science requires evidence in the only universe that we observe.' The multiverse theory often falls into the realm of speculation rather than rigorous scientific inquiry.

The Everett Multiverse and Quantum Mechanics

The Everett interpretation, also known as the Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, suggests that every possible outcome of every event is occurring in some universe. According to this theory, the universe is a multiverse, where each quantum event leads to an infinite number of parallel universes. This idea is rooted in quantum mechanics and not purely mystical. However, it remains a theoretical construct without empirical support.

Many scientists argue that the multiverse is not a scientific theory because it cannot be tested or verified. It is more of a philosophical or conceptual framework rather than a testable hypothesis. The Copenhagen interpretation, on the other hand, is more widely accepted in the scientific community due to its empirical support and repeatable experiments.

Alternative Perspectives on the Multiverse

Despite the lack of concrete evidence, some like philosopher Philip Gifford suggest the existence of numerous universes, dimensions, or planes. Gifford posits that these arenas of action are made by and in Cosmic Consciousness. This view blurs the line between scientific theory and metaphysical belief, creating a rich tapestry of ideas to explore.

A Critique of the Multiverse Theory

Some argue that the concept of the multiverse is nothing more than a convenient tool for science fiction and fantasy literature. It provides a framework for bringing back the dead or instant travel across vast distances, but it has little relevance to our understanding of the physical universe. The multiverse, as described by some, is a device used to justify fictional scenarios and escape the limits of our current understanding.

The 3-Dimensional Reality

Skepticism about the multiverse often stems from our 3-dimensional reality. In our observable universe, there is no evidence of other dimensions or parallel universes. Dimensions refer to size or shape and do not imply the existence of other universes. The universe that we know and observe is our local knowledge, which may or may not reveal the bigger picture.

There are two significant factors that influence our understanding of the universe. The first is the scale of distances, which makes it difficult to comprehend the true size of the universe. The second is the human sense of self-importance, which leads us to imagine that every choice we make creates a new universe. This is a significant fallacy and a source of misunderstanding.

The multiverse theory is often compared to the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, which suggests that every possible outcome of every event is occurring in some universe. This theory is not only difficult to verify but also ignores the critical aspect of time and change. Dimensions and coordinates are necessary for describing the universe, but time is not necessary unless there is a change. Our reality is 3-dimensional, and adding dimensions is not a straightforward task.

The Importance of Evidence and Testability

Ultimately, the concept of the multiverse remains a topic of heated debate. While it is an interesting idea, it must be approached with caution. Scientific theories require evidence and testability, and the concept of the multiverse lacks both. Theories that are purely speculative, such as the multiverse, are less likely to be accepted by the scientific community until they can be verified or falsified with empirical evidence.