Should NASCAR Be Canceled Due to Disavowals of ‘Let’s Go Brandon’?

Recently, discussions have resurfaced regarding the cancellation of NASCAR, a popular professional stock car racing organization, following the controversial 'Let’s Go Brandon' incident. This particular Internet phenomenon has sparked heated debates and polarizing opinions in online communities. This article delves into the rationale behind such discussions, analyzing various perspectives and explaining why the idea of canceling NASCAR is not only unrealistic but also unfounded.

The Controversial ‘Let’s Go Brandon’

The term 'Let’s Go Brandon' emerged from a viral YouTube video in 2007, wherein four young men were filmed using this phrase as an alternative to a more vulgar expression. The phrase quickly gained popularity, primarily among younger internet users, as a sneakier method to express frustration. However, over the years, it has been associated with various controversies, particularly the representation and perpetuation of inappropriate language and behavior.

The Internet Reaction

One user provocatively stated, 'What are these people a bunch of twelve-year-olds? Making up a saying to hide an obscenity and mess with the adults is something a seventh-grader would come up with.' This comment reflects a common sentiment among older generations, lambasting the younger demographic for engaging in immature behavior.

In response, another individual countered, 'I say no. It is such a small issue compared to other things entertainment and sports have done.' This perspective suggests that the issue at hand significantly pales in comparison to other transgressions in the world of entertainment and sports, such as doping, corruption, or ethical breaches.

Cancellation and Maturity

The suggestion to cancel NASCAR because of the 'Let’s Go Brandon' controversy highlights a broader debate about maturity, emotional quotient, and the responsibilities of adult behavior. One viewpoint posits, 'Let me get this clear. You think a multi-billion dollar sports industry should be stopped because you have the maturity and emotional quotient of a spoiled nine-year-old boy and you can’t just say "Fuck Joe Biden." ' This statement underscores the absurdity of such a proposition and highlights the importance of proportionality and context in evaluating issues.

Hypothetical Actions and Public Sentiment

Another individual suggested that fans could individually make a stand against NASCAR by burning any and all NASCAR items they own and never watching a stock car race. This action, while extreme, represents a more realistic approach compared to the theoretical idea of completely canceling a large-scale industry. However, this action would only affect a fraction of the fanbase, indicating the limited impact of such individual boycotting.

Finally, the question was posed, 'Now should the gov’t ban NASCAR? No as we do not have a totalitarian government that controls private business such as trump supporters seem to want.' This statement points out the impracticality of government intervention, emphasizing the lack of a centralized authoritarian control in modern democracies.

Conclusion

While the 'Let’s Go Brandon' controversy certainly raised concerns about the appropriateness and representation of language in our society, the suggestion to cancel NASCAR based on this issue is not a logical or practical solution. As a multi-billion dollar industry, NASCAR serves a significant role in the cultural and entertainment landscape. Cancellation would be a disproportionate and unnecessary act, overshadowing the importance of dialogue and change within the community. Instead of canceling, efforts should focus on promoting positive messaging, responsible behavior, and constructive dialogue to address such issues in a more meaningful and effective manner.