The Complex Dynamics of Israel's Water and Electricity Supply to Gaza: Debunking Misconceptions

The global discussion surrounding the Israeli control of water and electricity to the Gaza Strip often remains clouded by misconceptions. This article aims to clarify several key points and dispel common misunderstandings, particularly regarding the roles of external forces and the sovereignty of Israel.

Who is Responsible for Gaza's Water and Electricity?

A significant misunderstanding is that the international community, specifically the West, has a say in or is responsible for ensuring the supply of water and electricity to Gaza. However, the provision of these essential resources is not within the purview of the West. In fact, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) organized the supply, which was often obstructed by Israel.

Israel's Sovereignty and Its Actions

It is crucial to recognize that Israel is a sovereign nation, exercising its rights under international law. Like any country in a similar situation, Israel has the right to protect its population and its security. Actions such as reducing water and electricity supplies can be interpreted as efforts to mitigate the risk of conflict and protect Israeli citizens, rather than inhuman or unjust.

Israel has not unilaterally cut off the supply. Instead, it has reduced the supply in response to security concerns and past actions by Gaza. If a local neighbor continues to pose a threat despite financial incentives and repeated interruptions, reasonable actions to secure one's own safety and that of one's family would not be met with orders to continue providing aid. This analogy can be applied to Israel's relationship with Gaza.

Constructive Alternatives and Solutions

The article suggests that instead of holding Israel accountable for the actions of Gaza, the focus should be on finding constructive alternatives and solutions that benefit all parties. This might include international mediation, economic incentives, and humanitarian aid that does not compromise Israel's security.

It emphasizes that the complex situation in Gaza involves multiple layers of issues, including security, political, and humanitarian concerns. Resolving these issues requires a comprehensive approach that considers the sovereignty and rights of all involved parties.

Conclusion

The West, including the international community, cannot and should not order Israel to supply water and electricity to Gaza. Instead, efforts should be directed toward fostering a conducive environment that promotes peace, security, and humanitarian assistance, while respecting the sovereignty and rights of all nations involved.

Let us remember that every country, including Israel, has the right to protect its citizens and its land. The destruction of infrastructure and the targeting of civilian populations must be addressed, but under the framework of international law and in a manner that respects the sovereignty of all nations.