The Connection Between Julian Assange and Donald Trump: A Historical Context and Analysis

In recent years, the relationship between Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, and former U.S. President Donald J. Trump has been a subject of intense scrutiny and debate. This article aims to explore the historical events that have tied the two figures together, examining the context and implications of their connection.

The Impact of WikiLeaks on the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

One of the most significant turning points in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election was the release of internal Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails by WikiLeaks. These emails revealed extensive DNC corruption, which led to the resignations of three senior DNC officials. The leaks also documented the DNC's deliberate attempts to sabotage Bernie Sanders' primary election prospects and favor Hillary Clinton's candidacy.

This influence of WikiLeaks cannot be understated. The exposure of such sensitive information played a pivotal role in swaying public opinion and ultimately contributed to Donald Trump's victory. Democrats, progressives, and liberals viewed Assange and WikiLeaks as having committed the "ever unforgivable political sin" that not only affected the election's outcome but also undermined their trust in democratic institutions.

The Current State of Julian Assange and His Controversial Arrest

Julian Assange, an Australian national, sits as a political prisoner in extreme security and psychologically tortuous conditions. He is currently held by the British government, at the behest of the U.S. Government, on specious charges. Assange has been detained at Her Majesty's Prison Belmarsh in London since 2019, facing potential extradition to the United States.

Arthur Fowler, an Australian journalist, expressed his view that the bullying legal overreach by the U.S. is a symptom of weakness rather than strength, stemming from a dying empire filled with hubris and monumental errors of judgment. This critique highlights the broader narrative surrounding Assange's case and its implications for global journalistic freedom.

Donald Trump's Connection to WikiLeaks: A Case of Strategic Mistake

Former U.S. President Donald Trump's connection to WikiLeaks remains a massive unrequited political debt, long overdue. The Swamp's so-called intelligence community has, to an extent, convinced Trump to act against his own political interests by targeting Assange and WikiLeaks. However, many argue that Trump should have pardoned Assange or taken a more positive stance towards him, especially given his previously stated admiration for Assange's work.

Trump's strategic mistake in dealing with the situation can be attributed to the influence of the Deep State, which continues to operate with undue power and influence in the United States. This has led to a situation where Trump's interests were at stake, and the wrong decisions were made.

The Broader Implications and Call for Justice

The investigation and legal actions against Julian Assange have broader implications for press freedom, political integrity, and the rule of law. Advocates for Assange's release argue that he is a political prisoner and that the charges against him are unjust. Movements such as 'Free Julian Assange' and 'Julian Assange Matters' have gained traction, highlighting the importance of journalistic freedom and the right to publish information of public interest.

Artists and human rights activists have also taken a stand, with albums and artworks dedicated to the cause of freeing Assange. Organizations like Nils Melzer and Oliver Kobold are working to shed light on the case and advocate for Assange's release, as detailed in their book 'The Trial of Julian Assange: A Story of Persecution'.

Conclusion

The connection between Julian Assange and Donald Trump is a complex issue that has significant implications for both individuals and the broader context of journalism and politics. As the situation continues to evolve, it remains crucial to question the reasons behind Assange's detention and to advocate for justice and press freedom.

The wrong side of history may lie with the current stance on Assange, with many pointing to a failed political interference and a disregard for journalistic integrity.