The Current State of Digital Censorship and Its Impact

In recent years, the discourse around net neutrality has predominantly centered on the misconception that censorship is an issue. However, the reality is much more nuanced. Net neutrality, the principle that internet service providers (ISPs) should treat all data equally without discrimination, is focused on fair pricing, not censorship. The censorship issue mainly stems from content providers, particularly social media giants, who have the power to control what users can access and view.

Censorship and Net Neutrality: Separating Fact from Fiction

The US government is one of the few to enforce a certain level of censorship, primarily targeting child pornography. But when it comes to the internet itself, no such censorship exists under the banner of net neutrality. It is the content providers, especially major social media platforms, who wield substantial control over the internet's content landscape. These companies have the power to throttle or ban content based on their own policies and biases, which is a far cry from the neutral internet envisioned by net neutrality advocates.

The abuse of this power by tech companies has led to significant backlash. Companies like Comcast faced massive customer attrition when they spoke out against censorship. The story of 16 small ISPs who tragically closed their doors due to the backlash from supporting censorship is a troubling reminder of the consequences of aligning with these powerful entities.

Shocking Levels of Digital Censorship

Digital censorship has reached alarming levels, particularly in the realm of social media. This censorship has been most pronounced leading up to major political events, like the upcoming presidential election. The fact that gatekeepers of the internet are grooming their own policies to suppress or manipulate content is a gross abuse of trust. These platforms are not just arbiters of information; they are shaping the narrative in ways that can influence public opinion and election outcomes.

For years, these tech giants have progressively tightened their grip on content. The result is a chilling effect on free speech and expression, reminiscent of fascist regimes. Instead of engaging in healthy debate, these companies aim to silence dissenting voices. This is not just an ethical issue; it is a violation of basic democratic principles.

Addressing the Issue: Calls for Regulation and Transparency

The powers that be are starting to take notice. Mark Zuckerberg and Jack Dorsey are set to appear before Congress, where they will undoubtedly be questioned about the role of social media in the upcoming election. This is a critical moment that could shape the future of digital communication and free speech.

It is crucial that we address this issue through meaningful regulation and increased transparency. The tech companies must be held accountable for their actions and given limits on their power to suppress dissent. The droits to information and free speech are fundamental, and they must be protected.

Conclusion

The issue of digital censorship is far more pervasive and damaging than most people realize. While we cannot ignore the importance of net neutrality, the real culprit is the unchecked power of content providers in the digital ecosystem. Until we take meaningful steps to regulate these platforms and protect free speech, the future of the internet will continue to be compromised. The time for action is now.