The Dilemma of Biden’s Presidency: Will His Handlers Allow Him to Retire with Dignity?

Recent musings about Joseph Biden Jr.'s retirement have underscored a complex interplay of political strategy, perceived necessity, and internal resistance from those close to him. The question hangs heavily: will Biden's puppet handlers allow him the dignity of retiring, or will they continue to push him to fulfill a full term?

The Impact and Legacy of Trump’s Legacy

One common theme echoing through these discussions is the Trump Derangement Syndrome. It is a term frequently employed by some to criticize those who remain emotionally attached to former President Donald Trump’s legacy, despite his controversial actions and policies. The mention of this phenomenon highlights the divide between those seeking to move on from past administrations and those who hold on to them fervently.

It's worth noting that those who criticize Biden often do so within the context of Trump Derangement Syndrome, suggesting a bias that discounts the real damage done by Trump and his administration to the American people. This perspective, however, fails to acknowledge the legitimate concerns and lasting impacts of policies and actions implemented during his tenure.

Political Files and Potential Prosecution

Another significant factor in this equation is the looming threat of prosecution. The FBI's investigation into the breakout of classified documents from the White House, involving then-VP Mike Pence and former President Donald Trump, has cast a long shadow over the political landscape. As Biden begins to wind down his presidency, there is a real possibility that similar allegations could arise for him, particularly given the volume of classified materials he reportedly mishandled over the years.

Those who control Biden, primarily his handlers and the radical left, have a vested interest in prolonging his term. They have expertise in political manipulation and have a history of bending the rules to achieve their goals. They are more than willing to gamble on bringing him back to power, regardless of the legal and ethical consequences.

The Personal and Professional Considerations of Adversity

Personal circumstances also play a crucial role. For example, Jill Biden, the First Lady, would likely experience emotional distress if Joe Biden were to step down abruptly. Her desire for the spotlight and prominence would be hard to quell. This emotional and professional attachment complicates the decision-making process, as it aligns less with a sense of purpose and more with a need to maintain personal stability and position.

In addition, political leaders often face a tenuous balance between fulfilling their term and addressing the legal and ethical dilemmas that may arise. The prospect of impeachment and prosecution for past actions could deter even the most pragmatic politicians from resigning. In the case of Trump, this was a real concern, and the NFLC (National Faith Leaders Coalition) had to work within the framework of the law and public opinion to influence decisions.

Civilian Law and Political Strategy

The civics lesson everyone seems to have missed lies in the complex nature of political strategy and the role of civil law. Political parties do not simply 'let' a president fulfill his term. While examples such as Richard Nixon's resignation after the Watergate scandal often provide a parallel, the variables in play are far more complex. Political parties, especially those loyal to a presidency, would not typically recommend impeachment or resignation unless the evidence is overwhelming and the damage to the party is minimal.

In the context of Biden's presidency, the possibility of timely and effective counsel from within his own party, much like Spiro Agnew did for Nixon, is not out of the question. However, the effectiveness of such counsel would depend on the specific circumstances and the current political climate. As Brian S. Prow often suggests, there is always hope for rational discourse and reasoned decision-making in politics, despite the prevailing biases and emotional attachments.

In conclusion, the question of whether Biden’s handlers will allow him to retire with dignity remains a multifaceted issue. It involves personal relationships, political strategy, and the looming shadow of legal and ethical challenges. The path ahead will undoubtedly be fraught with complexities and uncertainties, and the role of those who control him will be crucial in determining the outcome.