TechTorch

Location:HOME > Technology > content

Technology

The Hiding of Advanced Technology: The Government’s Role and Corporate Strategy

April 24, 2025Technology1240
What Technology Do You Think the Government Is Hiding? Questions swirl

What Technology Do You Think the Government Is Hiding?

Questions swirling around the government’s secrets are not new, and one topic that continually captures attention is whether advanced technology is being hidden. While the term 'Deep State/New World Order' often pops up in discussions, it's essential to separate fact from fiction.

The Deepest Hides: High-Resolution Satellite Imagery

High-resolution satellite imagery is a prime example of technology that can often be classified. Governments and corporations fund many classified projects, some of which may be beyond the public's current comprehension. While the governments do keep some serious technology hidden, anything that is extremely advanced would likely become known in a few years due to leaks.

Behind the Scenes: The Deep State Myth

The term 'Deep State/New World Order' is often used to imply a shadowy, powerful group hiding advanced technologies. However, there is no substantial evidence to support such a concept. Modern technology is often years behind theoretical developments, and the idea of 'anti-gravity planes' and such is just speculative, given that humanity does not fully understand gravity itself.

Corporate America's Hidden Innovations

It's not just governments that keep technology under wraps; corporations also employ strategic concealment. Corporations often stagger the release of their best technologies to maximize profits from their lesser innovations first. A prime example is the case of Edward Howard Armstrong, a pioneer in electrical wave communication.

The Story of Edward Howard Armstrong

Armstrong's path to technological achievements is a testament to corporate strategy. In the early 20th century, Armstrong invented the Audion, a device that enabled long-distance communication. He demonstrated its capabilities to David Sarnoff, a manager at the Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company.

Sarnoff recognized the immense potential of Armstrong's invention and offered him significant financial incentives to license the technology. However, Armstrong discovered that Sarnoff had also been working on a similar invention, and a lengthy legal battle ensued. Armstrong eventually won recognition for his contributions, but not without delays in the widespread adoption of his technology.

Lessons in Legal Battles and Technological Flow

Thecase of Armstrong and Sarnoff highlights the lengths corporations will go to maintain control over technology. Sarnoff often delayed the implementation of new technologies to protect existing investments and maximize profits.

For instance, even though Armstrong had demonstrated the potential of FM radio in 1934, Sarnoff insisted on continuing with AM technology. This delay meant that consumers still had to deal with static until the late 1960s when entire radio stations finally switched to FM.

These examples underscore the broader truth that technological progress often takes longer than we think. It can take decades for new technologies to reach the masses, and corporate interests frequently delay their widespread adoption.

Conclusion

While it is tempting to believe that governments and corporations are hiding revolutionary technologies, the reality is often more complex. High-resolution satellite imagery, while classified, is one area where technology might not be as hidden as imagined. In the corporate world, technologies like FM radio demonstrate the strategic decisions that can delay widespread use, sometimes for decades.

Ultimately, the advancement of human civilization depends on overcoming our need for control and power. The only way to truly shape the future is by accelerating technological progress and sharing it equitably.