The Tragic Truth Behind a 12-person Jury

For centuries, the concept of a 12-person jury has been a cornerstone of justice in many legal systems, including England and the United States. The idea that a randomly selected jury of 12 individuals can ensure fair judgment has long been enshrined in legal traditions. However, as a former Marine with an Honorable Discharge, I want to shed light on the realities of the 12-person jury system, revealing the hidden truths that lie beneath its surface.

The Origin and Purpose of the 12-person Jury

Let's start with the basics. The foundational principle of jury trials can be traced back to medieval England under William the Conqueror in 1066. The establishment of trial by jury, as described by "12 men of true," was a pivotal moment in legal history. The rationale behind this system was to ensure that decisions were made based on the collective wisdom of everyday citizens, rather than the biased or corrupt judgements of a single authority figure.

The Disturbing Truths of the Judicial System

While jurors are meant to bring impartiality to the courtroom, the truth is often obscured by various systemic issues. The notion that any judge, lawyer, or court official could be biased or corrupt is a stark reality, especially in the context of the United States. In my personal experience, I've encountered a system where court officials and judges are subject to influences ranging from political affiliations to outright corruption.

One of the most concerning aspects of the legal system is the widespread practice of judicial discrimination. As a "Pro Per Poor Dirt" individual, I've faced numerous challenges in getting fair treatment in court. Judges often assume that anyone representing themselves in court lacks the necessary legal expertise, leading to a presumption of guilt. Furthermore, the use of fee waivers to file cases often results in the judge applied an extreme prejudice, further limiting the chances of a fair trial.

The Jury Trial: A Siren Song of Fairness

Perhaps one of the most disheartening realities is the manipulation of jury trials. Despite the intention of a 12-person jury to ensure fairness, the system is rife with secrets and biases. For instance, if a defendant is representing themselves pro per, the judge may refuse to grant a jury trial, knowing that this will limit the defendant's chances of receiving a fair hearing. This is a clear example of a judge manipulating the system to secure a biased outcome.

Numerous judges have been found to be corrupt, selling their decisions to the highest bidder. This practice serves to reinforce the existing power structures and ensure that the rich and powerful continue to control the outcomes of legal proceedings. The use of bench trials for the poor, uneducated, or disabled is another form of discrimination that further perpetuates social and racial inequalities in the legal system.

Proof and Testing the System

To verify the validity of these claims, I sought the assistance of an experienced attorney, Attorney Robert Rice, to challenge my case to the point where it would necessitate a jury trial. However, my request was denied by Judge Hess, who was subsequently forced off the bench. This outcome not only confirms the existence of systemic corruption but also highlights the lengths to which the judicial system will go to maintain its power and influence.

To further substantiate my claims, I brought witnesses to court to testify against the justice system. The presence of guns and metal detectors in courtrooms serves as a constant reminder of the hostility and potential physical danger that one might face when challenging the system on their own.

Conclusion and Call to Action

It is my sincerest hope that this article will serve as an awakening for all who may find themselves facing a legal battle. The truth is that the 12-person jury system is not the gentle and impartial mechanism it appears to be. Instead, it is a tool manipulated by those in power to maintain the status quo. By unveiling the secrets and biases that lie beneath this system, I aim to empower you to question the authority of the legal system and demand transparency and fairness.

As Americans, we must take it upon ourselves to educate ourselves and others about the realities of the legal system. By doing so, we can work towards a more just and equitable society where the 12-person jury truly serves the purpose it was designed for—upholding the integrity and fairness of the law for all individuals, regardless of their social or economic standing.

May this article serve as a reminder to stand strong and never venture into a hostile environment alone. Let us work together to challenge the biases and discriminatory practices in the legal system and pave the way for a more just and fair future. God bless America, and God bless us all for this cause.

Amen.