The Truth Behind Global Warming: Debunking Lies and Government Motivations

The narrative surrounding global warming often becomes muddled with misinformation and government-led initiatives. In this article, we delve into the history, underlying motivations, and the truth behind the alarmism surrounding global warming and climate change.

Debunking the Racist and Inflammatory Remarks Against Winslow

While some individuals spread inflammatory remarks and baseless accusations against others, it is essential to focus on the facts. Winslow's answer is criticized as total lying, attributed to an unqualified clown who prevents public comment on their answers. This attitude is not conducive to a constructive and informed dialogue on such a critical issue.

Fourier: A Pioneering Figure in the Field of Heat Flow

Contrary to negative rhetoric, notable figures like Joseph Fourier, a French mathematician and physicist, made significant contributions to the study of heat flow, which is foundational to understanding climate dynamics. Fourier's work laid the groundwork for Fourier Analysis, a critical tool in modern scientific research. His studies under Napoleon as a Prefect of a Department highlight his importance in bridging mathematics and physics.

Who Really Invented the Concept of Global Warming?

The notion of global warming has been repeatedly questioned. However, behind the scenes, government motivations often play a significant role. Contrary to popular belief, the US government was deeply involved in promoting the use of renewable energy sources. Here are some key initiatives:

1. Embracing Solar Energy and Renewable Sources

Before the concept of global warming became widely known, the US government sought to encourage the development and adoption of renewable energy sources. Policies were implemented to:

Support the installation of solar panels on residential rooftops. Promote the construction of more energy-efficient homes and the improvement of existing ones. Urge the replacement of old, energy-inefficient appliances with newer, more efficient models. Encourage the purchase of high-mileage or electric vehicles instead of gas-guzzling cars. Implement smart meters and time-of-use billing to track energy usage more efficiently. Introduce a progressive tax system on fuel, increasing the tax as consumption increases, unless there is a noticeable decline in consumption.

Did this happen before any climate alarmists came to prominence? Yes, it did. This indicates that the US government's interest in renewable energy and reduced oil consumption predated the widespread awareness of global warming.

2. Scientific Examinations Paid for by the Government

The US government invested in scientific research to identify potential long-term problems caused by the use of fossil fuels. This was unsurprisingly successful as "scientists" paid by the government found what they were paid to find. The lack of objectivity in these studies raises questions about their validity.

3. Historical Context and Presidential Initiatives

To gain a deeper understanding of the historical context, one must explore the history of oil production. The "Seven Sisters," Arab-Israeli conflicts, and the formation of the monopolistic Arab-OPEC oil cartel provide valuable insights. Additionally, the history of global oil prices, embargoes, and related economic impacts, as well as the policies of U.S. presidents, especially Jimmy Carter, offer a richer context.

4. Media and Government Influence

Media outlets like NBC News have discussed how OPEC "weaponizes" its control over oil. President Carter's dire warnings to use less oil and his efforts to promote energy independence are well-documented. The National Energy Program Fact Sheet elaborates on these initiatives, emphasizing Carter's specific directives to fund scientists to investigate problems caused by fossil fuel usage.

While the global cooling claim was the initial alarmism, the subsequent claims such as acid rain, ozone "holes," global warming, ice cap melt, sea level rise, climate "change," ocean acidification, Pacific "garbage patches," and the battle against single-use plastics all followed in rapid succession.

It is worth noting that many of the proposed solutions, such as the promotion of solar, geothermal, and biofuel use, as well as increased public transportation and home insulation, are the same actions that Carter first suggested.

Is this a coincidence? Of course, not. The alignment of these government and scientific initiatives suggests a more coordinated effort than meets the eye.