Why Don't Militaries Use Sniper Rifles Instead of Regular Assault Rifles?

The question of why militaries don't use sniper rifles instead of regular assault rifles is a multifaceted one that goes beyond the mere statistics of shots to kills. This discrepancy is often misunderstood, as the answers usually overlook the crucial role of the spotter, the unsung hero in the battle environment. The spotter, often a fellow infantryman, is responsible for identifying targets and delivering precise shots, making the one-shot kills achievable. However, relying exclusively on snipers would have significant drawbacks for the military as a whole.

The Importance of the Spotter and Scopeds-Assault Rifles

Far from being a simple choice between weapon types, modern military tactics emphasize the use of different tools and weapon systems for various battlefield scenarios. While some militaries opt for scoped assault rifles, others prefer dedicated sniper rifles. For instance, some sections of the Singaporean army wield scoped assault rifles that allow for both close-range combat and long-range precision. However, this does not mean that squads can fully replace rifles with scopes on all their weapons. The versatility of traditional assault rifles is crucial for rapid victories in close-quarters combat and assaults, where snipers might not be as effective.

Modern Warfare: Beyond Body Counts

The primary goal of military engagements is not simply to count kills but to achieve strategic objectives that force the enemy to retreat, surrender, or disengage. This concept can be encapsulated in the phrase 'Go away or I’ll kill you.' Even though the ratio of ‘shots to kills’ is often high, it is primarily due to the effectiveness of suppressing fire provided by assault rifles. These rifles are designed not just for immediate engagement but also to neutralize enemy positions and create opportunities for other combatants.

The Role of Suppressing Fire

Assault rifles are particularly effective for suppressing fire because they can be fired rapidly and exchanged quickly, making the enemy hesitant to move. Even if a sniper can achieve a one-shot kill, the enemy remains aware of the danger and will take steps to avoid it. This constant fear can lead to significant delays and hesitation in enemy movements, giving friendly forces a substantial advantage. Additionally, the sound of gunfire can add to the psychological pressure on the enemy, making it harder for them to hold their positions.

Modern Infantry Tactics and the Bayonet

Modern infantry tactics are designed around the principles of ‘fire and movement’. These tactics rely on the ability to suppress the enemy while moving to engage hand-to-hand combat, grenade throwing, or other close-range engagements. The rifle, in this context, is a versatile tool used not only to kill but also to suppress. Historically, the bayonet has been used in close-quarters combat to neutralize the enemy effectively. While fewer soldiers can personally use sniper rifles, almost anyone can use an assault rifle to a degree that the enemy finds it best to avoid being hit.

In conclusion, while sniper rifles offer unparalleled accuracy and lethality, they do not replace the role of assault rifles in modern military engagements. The diversity of military equipment is crucial to ensure effective and varied combat operations. Understanding the role of suppressive fire, the importance of the spotter, and the specific tactical requirements of different scenarios is essential for a nuanced approach to military strategy and tactics.