Unveiling the Truth About Matthew Boylan's NASA Claims

No. Im a Flat Earther and it has been exposed that Matt Boylan simply fabricated the story that he was contracted to work for NASA to get the story out and get views. Earth IS flat. But Matt never worked for NASA even as a contractor.

The Veracity of Matthew Boylan's Astronautical Claims

Mathew Boylan, a prominent Flat Earth proponent, has claimed to have worked for NASA as a graphic artist. However, there is no verifiable evidence to support his claims of employment with NASA. Investigations into his background have not confirmed any official ties to the agency. His assertions are often viewed skeptically within the scientific community and among those who study conspiracy theories. It is important to critically evaluate such claims and rely on credible sources for information.

Why This Matters

Matthew Boylan's claims raise important questions about the integrity of individuals who make unsubstantiated claims about their professional affiliations. I used to play music for a church. In a manner of speaking, I worked for God. That doesn't mean I understood or believed anything about religion. Simply being employed by NASA is not a credential in and of itself. What about the old ladies who famously sewed the spacesuits? Would they have had to undergo training in astrodynamics? The guy is/was a loon!

Exposing the Motives and Tactics of Pseudoscience Promoters

Matthew Boylan, just like many other Flat Earth proponents, is often seen as a huckster out to make a fast buck. He makes videos and sells books to gullible people who lack critical thinking skills. It is hard to prove that he didn't work for NASA, but consider this: NASA employs janitors, accountants, and plumbers. Just because someone worked for them doesn't mean that they know squat about science, math, rockets, or anything of the sort.

Boyland's stupid arguments are ridiculously easy to dismiss. Ignore his lunacy. Maybe as a janitor or something. But anyone with more than a third or fourth-grade education knows it's a globe. You just have to look out the window from the International Space Station (ISS) to see that.

More tellingly, Matthew Boylan's picture work primarily falls into the category of "artist's conception." This type of art is often used to represent concepts that are beyond the current capabilities of technology or that require a degree of abstraction to convey. Hence, his label as a "picture painter" for NASA is more about aesthetics than empirical knowledge.

Conclusion

Matthew Boylan's claims and those of the Flat Earth movement in general, should be met with skepticism and a critical eye. The scientific community and the broader public should remain vigilant in distinguishing between genuine expertise and pseudoscience. When evaluating claims, maintaining a healthy dose of skepticism, and relying on credible sources, is key.