What Defines a Song as 'Explicit'?

The term 'explicit' when applied to music refers to content deemed inappropriate for general audiences. This can include profanity, sexual content, violence, and substance abuse. However, determining which songs fall into this category is a subjective process.

Criteria for an 'Explicit' Song

Several elements define a song as 'explicit.' These criteria include the use of profanity, sexual content, violent imagery, and substance abuse in the lyrics. The use of expletives, particularly violent or obscene terms, often leads to a song being labeled 'explicit.' While the f-word is a common trigger, not all explicit songs contain it. For instance, some albums with mature content might avoid explicit labeling due to the context of the song or the used language.

Specifically, the following elements are significant in determining a song's explicit nature:

Profanity

Word choice is crucial, particularly the use of strong or vulgar language, including profanity. Even a single expletive can propel a song into the 'explicit' category, especially if the context involves violence, sexual themes, or offensive language.

Sexual Content

References to sexual acts, suggestive themes, or graphic descriptions can also classify a song as 'explicit.' However, the interpretation of what constitutes 'explicit' sexual content varies widely. For example, some songs might contain sexual themes but remain non-explicit if they do not reach a certain threshold of graphic detail or promote negative behaviors.

Violence

Violent imagery, depictions of abuse, or discussions of criminal activity contribute to a song being labeled 'explicit.' The portrayal of violence can be direct or implied, and its level and context are important in determining the song's explicit nature.

Substance Abuse

References to drug or alcohol use that might promote these behaviors can also elevate a song's explicit status. However, songs that discuss substance abuse in a more cautionary or descriptive manner without glorifying the behavior may still remain 'clean.'

Subjectivity and Regional Differences

The categorization of a song as 'explicit' is highly subjective. What one person might consider explicit, another might see as appropriate. This subjectivity is influenced by local cultural norms and values. In some regions or countries, additional content such as political statements might also be considered 'explicit.'

For example, an incident involving BTS and BigHit Entertainment highlights cultural sensitivity. Certain Korean phrases, such as 'niga you' and 'naega,' were self-censored by BigHit Entertainment when playing BTS songs on US radio stations. These phrases sound similar to the 'n-word' in English, leading to cultural relativism in labeling explicit content.

Besides profanity and explicit content, the decision to label a song as 'explicit' can vary based on the local standards. In some countries, songs with political messages or religious references might also be considered inappropriate for general audiences.

General Guidelines for Judging 'Explicit' Content

There is no universal standard for what counts as 'explicit' content. However, general guidelines include:

Consider the song's lyrics and the overall context. Assess whether the content is obscene or unsuitable for general audiences. Imagine if you could play the song in a school classroom without offending anyone. If you have any doubts, it's best to consider it 'explicit.'

While these guidelines can be helpful, it's important not to be overly restrictive. For instance, Tipper Gore's overly cautious approach to some songs, such as John Denver's 'Country Roads, Take Me Home' or Dee Snyder Frank Zappa's controversial lyrics, led to unnecessary public scrutiny and misunderstandings. Experts in the field, including Dee Snyder and Frank Zappa, are often misunderstood when their language is scrutinized.