Why Do We Still Trust Computers Despite Cyber Attacks?

Every now and then, we hear about new cyber attacks that compromise the security of our digital systems. Despite these vulnerabilities, computers remain the backbone of many critical infrastructures, such as government operations, banking, power grids, and hospitals. This essay explores the delicate balance between the risks and benefits of relying on such technologies.

Cyber Security Challenges and Vulnerabilities

The argument that computers are highly vulnerable to cyber attacks is not without merit. Robust security measures and continuous improvement in cybersecurity are essential to protect sensitive information and maintain the integrity of these systems. However, for many users, the most significant risk may not be the insecurities in the operating systems but the human element. Just as bribery can compromise the safety of society, human error and the allure of financial gain can lead to significant breaches in digital security.

The Doctrine of Necessity

A common defense against these risks is to argue that despite their vulnerabilities, computers are the best way to achieve our goals. To illustrate, let us draw a parallel to another technology that has its own set of risks: cars. Cars are suseptable to having their tires punctured, leading to dangerous blowouts at high speeds and all sorts of accidents. Why do we use them when they have this dangerous flaw? The answer lies in the notion that sometimes, the benefits of a technology outweigh its risks.

Consider the world we live in now. Imagine a world without computers, one where all monetary transactions are physical. Imagine bank robbers having to heist physical cash. No credit cards, no cellphones, and a million other conveniences would be absent. Would we really want to revert to such a world? The answer is likely no, as the world we have access to today is largely shaped by the efficiency and convenience provided by digital technologies.

The Efficiency of Scale and Centralized Systems

Centralized systems, like those powered by computers, operate based on the principle of efficiency of scale. These systems provide more goods and services to more people because they are more efficient. For instance, think of government trash collection, water pipes, sewage pipes, and electricity. These systems are necessary for the smooth functioning of modern society. They allow us to harness the benefits of mass production and distribution, which would be impossible if we relied solely on decentralized or locally produced resources.

The efficiency of these systems means that, on average, they can deliver better outcomes for more people. In some cases, the robust, centralized systems that rely on technologies like computers can be more adaptable and resilient than inefficient, antifragile systems. For example, while an antifragile stone age society might be more adaptable in certain ways, it would struggle to fend off life-ending comets or other catastrophic threats that modern technology can mitigate.

The Cost of Antifragility

The quest for antifragility comes with a significant downside. As we strive to make our systems more resilient, we often sacrifice efficiency and scalability. This can lead to a less productive and less innovative society, where the benefits of technology are diminished. In contrast, the robustness of our current systems allows us to continue advancing, even if that progress is sometimes marred by vulnerabilities.

Ultimately, the question of whether to trust computers despite cyber attacks is a complex one. While these systems are undoubtedly vulnerable, their benefits in terms of efficiency, scale, and convenience make them indispensable. The challenge lies in continuously improving our cybersecurity measures to protect these systems while not completely forsaking the advantages they bring to our lives.