Why Doesn't Modi Engage with Rahul Gandhi in Debates?

There is a fervent belief among some that Rahul Gandhi should engage more in debates against Prime Minister Narendra Modi. However, it is essential to understand the context of political statuses and responsibilities in Indian politics. Rahul Gandhi, the General Secretary of the Indian National Congress, often portrays himself as a formidable opponent, but his actions and statements lack the credibility needed for such a debate.

Rahul Gandhi's Political Status

Rahul Gandhi, besides being the leader of the Indian National Congress, is often perceived as the self-crowned king of one party. This status, however, does not translate into a credible political figure who can challenge the constitutional and elected Prime Minister of the country. Even those uneducated, like the author's driver, are influenced by Rahul's constant noise and agitation without understanding the real issues or having any substantial proof.

Defence Minister Nirmala Sitaraman Clarifies the Rafale Deal

The Rafale deal, an important matter involving India's defense strategy, has been a topic of public discourse. Defence Minister Nirmala Sitaraman has taken the position of clarifying the details in a press conference. She has explained that the entire matter is under the decision-making authority of the courts. The judiciary needs to know the facts, not private opinions, arguments, or misplaced complaints.

Discrediting the Modi Government with Undisclosed Claims

Ironically, Rahul Gandhi's actions often seem more like an attempt to discredit the Modi government rather than engage in a meaningful discussion. His repeated public confrontations and insults towards the Prime Minister lack the dignity and decorum appropriate for such a high-level figure. Furthermore, Rahul Gandhi sometimes brings up past Governments' scandals, such as those under the UPA (United Progressive Alliance) regime led by Manmohan Singh, in an attempt to demean the current administration without providing any concrete evidence.

Carpe Diem or the Labor Force Speaks Up

Debates between equals are constructive, but Rahul Gandhi's approach lacks the credibility and respect required. His behavior showcases an attitude that does not address the core issues and instead focuses on personality attacks. When such behavior becomes commonplace, it loses the public's trust and support. The auto drivers, cab drivers, and other labor force, who form a significant portion of the voting population, are quick to mock and criticize Rahul Gandhi for his unprofessional and disrespectful behavior.

Proposed Alternatives

Rather than engaging in inane public confrontations, Rahul Gandhi could gain more respect through constructive dialogue. Participation in a talk show and sharing his thoughts and ideas with the public through a more structured format might be a better way for him to engage with the electorate.

Conclusion

To sum up, the Rafale deal is not a debate topic between Prime Minister Modi and Rahul Gandhi, but a matter of national interest that needs to be addressed by the competent authorities. Rahul Gandhi's public behavior undermines the dignity of the Prime Minister's office and is viewed unfavorably by the majority of the population. Instead of launching attacks, he should focus on contributing positively to the nation's discourse.

Keywords: Rafale deal, Modi vs Gandhi, Indian Politics