Why Families in Troubled Nations Choose to Procreate Despite Challenges

The question of why families in nations like North Korea choose to have children, despite the certain knowledge that these children will suffer for their entire lives, has sparked considerable debate. This perplexing choice can be dissected through a combination of biological, social, and psychological factors. This article delves into the complexities behind these decisions, examining the role of biological imperatives, misconceptions about suffering, and the human drive to pass on genes.

Biological Imperatives and Reproduction

One of the most fundamental reasons for the continuation of life is the biological imperative to reproduce. From a biological standpoint, every organism is driven to ensure the continuation of its genes. Humans are no exception. Even in harsh conditions, the urge to pass on one's genetic material remains strong. This is not merely a human trait but a universal phenomenon seen across many species. Despite the obvious challenges and suffering in countries like North Korea, the human instinct for replication may override the logical knowledge of potential hardships faced by offspring.

Misconceptions About Suffering

A key issue is the misconception that those living in troubled nations like North Korea are more suffering than they actually are. As mentioned, life for many in North Korea is far from idyllic, with scarcity of food, water, and reliable electricity. However, this harsh reality becomes normalized over generations. People who have grown up in such environments may not realize the stark contrast with the living conditions of people in other parts of the world. This normalization can lead to a situation where they do not perceive their own suffering as extreme or unique. Consequently, the decision to have children is influenced by a sense of normalcy rather than despair.

Policy and Propaganda

The policies and propaganda in countries like North Korea also play a crucial role in shaping the narrative around reproduction. The regime often emphasizes the importance of having children as a means to uphold the country and support the leaders. Leader Kim Jong-un has made speeches encouraging women to have more children, suggesting that the state's survival and the continuation of the regime depend on population growth. This political pressure can override the individual choices of families, especially when access to birth control and options like abortion are limited.

Reductio Ad Absurdum and Human Resilience

One approach to understanding this phenomenon is through the logical method of Reductio ad Absurdum. It involves assuming an extreme situation and deducing that it must be false if absurd conclusions are reached. In the case of North Korea, the persistent decision to have children despite the knowledge of potential suffering suggests that the situation is not as dire as it could be. This implies that North Koreans are not as acutely suffering as one might assume. The resilience and determination of people to continue their lineage under such conditions challenge the notion that their lives are unbearable.

People's Knowledge and Reality

There is an underlying assumption that North Koreans are oblivious to the harsh realities of the rest of the world. However, it is more accurate to say that their understanding of the world is deeply influenced by the propaganda and daily life within North Korea. They may know that food is scarce and winters are harsh, but they may not fully grasp the extent of suffering outside their borders. This narrow perception is not a testament to their ignorance, but rather a reflection of the closed and controlled nature of their society.

People in troubled nations, including North Korea, face numerous challenges and uncertainties. Despite the potential suffering of their children, the biological drive to reproduce, combined with a normalized sense of hardship and political pressure, often leads to the continuation of families. Understanding these factors can provide a more nuanced perspective on the decision-making processes of individuals in challenging environments.