Would the Presidential Transition Be Obvious If Joe Biden Died? A Debated Perspective

In the highly interconnected world of politics and media, the question of visibility and transition in the wake of a potential leadership change has been a topic of intense debate. This article delves into the hypothetical scenario where Joe Biden were to pass away, exploring the likelihood of immediate recognition and the subsequent changes or lack thereof in the political landscape.

Immediate Recognition of a Transition

The Vice President, Kamala Harris, would immediately assume the role of the President should Joe Biden die in office. This transition is widely anticipated, as the Vice President is traditionally next in line for the presidency.

The transition would not go unnoticed. According to political analyst Bob Davis of The Wall Street Journal, the following evening’s news would indeed highlight the event: the announcement would be widely broadcasted, and the media would report extensively on the quick succession. As Davis points out: "Of course people would know! Since the Vice President would become the POTUS."

Perception through Media and Public Figures

A recent video purportedly showing Joe Biden was shared online. Upon closer inspection, various discrepancies were observed:

Facial features, such as the distance between the chin and eyebrows, were noted to be different. The positioning of the nose also showed variation. Even the overall height and energy levels seemed inconsistent. The use of masks, which can obscure facial features, was also a point of consideration, as they can be deceiving.

These observations, while interesting, do not offer a definitive indication of Biden's current state. They do, however, highlight the importance of continuous and unfiltered information in verifying a leader's health and well-being.

Another concern is whether Biden's condition or dementia might be differently portrayed by those in positions of influence. The question of who wears the mask, figuratively and literally, adds another layer of complexity to the matter.

The political landscape would continue to function as it has been, regardless of the apparent health of the current leader. Even among those who advocate for a more socialist democracy, such as the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), it is widely acknowledged that Kamala Harris is too inexperienced and not sufficiently wise to assume the reins of power. Even with her nomination for the Vice Presidency in 2020, she is still considered by many to be insufficiently prepared for the rigors of the presidency.

Committed DSA members understand the extent of her limitations and thus are unlikely to support her connection to power. The current administration and political network, under the guise of the so-called "Mr. Senility," would continue to operate in the same manner, smooth over any perceived issues, and maintain the status quo.

The Continuity of Government

The continuity of government would be maintained, regardless of the specific leader. As seen in the case of other sudden transitions, like that of Richard Nixon, the machinery of the government would adapt and move forward without significant disruption. The same would likely hold true for a Biden presidency, even if it were to end abruptly.

This scenario prompts us to question the reliability of information and the role of media in verifying leadership. It also highlights the importance of transparency and continuous oversight to ensure the well-being and capability of our leaders.

Furthermore, it underscores the idea that political continuity is not merely about the preservation of policies but also about the stability and functionality of the system itself.