Boris Johnson and Jeremy Hunt: A Tale of Controversy and Consequences

Recently, the topic of Boris Johnson appointing Jeremy Hunt as Chancellor of the Exchequer has sparked intense debate and speculation in the political circles. This article delves into the nuances of this potential appointment, examining its implications on political dynamics and the potential fallout.

Background and Context

Boris Johnson, the current Prime Minister, is known for deviating from traditional practices in managing his cabinet. Rather than bringing his competitors close as a strategic move, he opts for loyalty and strict adherence to what he perceives as political correctness. This approach has led to various controversial decisions, such as approving fracking in Jeremy Hunt's constituency in Surrey, a move that seems to follow a pattern of favoring those who are politically compliant over those with relevant experience.

Current Minister's Competence and Future Prospects

The incumbent Chancellor, Rishi Sunak, has been notably absent from his role. Despite this, the decision on whether to maintain the status quo or bring in Jeremy Hunt appears more about political maneuvering than merit. Sunak, like many others appointed under Johnson, may serve more as a figurehead or a puppet, acting as a placeholder rather than a strategic asset for policymaking.

Jeremy Hunt's Integrity and Future Path

Jeremy Hunt, if appointed, faces the critical choice of either accepting a role that seems more about loyalty than competence or staying true to his integrity. While he has the opportunity to serve as a more hands-on cabinet member, he must weigh the potential political fallout against the principle of accepting a position that may expose him as a political yes-man or Johnson supporter.

Given Hunt's background and integrity, declining the offer would not only demonstrate his principles but also position him as a potential leader who could work against Johnson's government. His current alignment with Johnson means he could effectively act as an internal opposition leader, steering clear of Johnson's coalition of chaos and setting his sights on Johnson's eventual departure.

Political Implications of an Appointment

An appointment of Jeremy Hunt as Chancellor could have several implications. Firstly, it would imply demoting or sacking incumbent Rishi Sunak, a move that could alienate backbench MPs and create internal rifts within the Conservative party. On the downside, retaining Sunak as a new source of friction among MPs loyal to Johnson would also pose challenges.

Moreover, the action of promoting Hunt could backfire if publicly declined by Hunt, leaving Johnson exposed and humiliated. This scenario underscores the delicate balance Johnson must maintain between loyalty, competence, and political opportunism.

Conclusion

The question of whether Boris Johnson should make Jeremy Hunt Chancellor of the Exchequer hinges on a complex interplay of loyalty, competence, and political strategy. Any move will have significant repercussions on the political landscape, potentially leading to either a strengthening of Johnson's position or a push for his eventual removal.

As of now, the appointment remains uncertain, highlighting the ongoing dynamics within the Conservative party and the unpredictable nature of British politics.