Technology
Gandhiji and Nehrus Stance on Vinayak Damodar Savarkar: An Analysis
Introduction
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, often referred to as Veer Savarkar, was a champion of Hindu nationalism and a fierce proponent of redefining Indian history. Despite his contributions to Indian independence and his unwavering commitment to the Hindu cause, Savarkar's relationship with Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru is a topic of considerable debate. This article delves into the dynamics of this relationship and highlights the contrasting stances of these influential figures.
Fighting for Nationalism
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar was no ordinary freedom fighter. His dedication to the cause of Indian nationalism was unwavering, and he was willing to make significant sacrifices. Whether it was leading revolutionary groups, attempting daring escapes, or writing from prison, Savarkar demonstrated a steely resolve that few could match. Unlike many other patriots, he was willing to forsake his personal safety and comfort for what he believed was the right thing to do.
Challenges and Triumphs
Despite the challenges he faced, Savarkar's commitment to converting Muslims back to Hinduism and abolishing untouchability in Ratnagiri did not wane. His efforts ultimately bore fruit, as untouchability vanished from this orthodox bastion. Another significant milestone was his firm opposition to the partition of India, a stance that set him apart from many of his contemporaries.
Political Alliances and Ideological Differences
Savarkar's ideological alignment with the Hindu Mahasabha was staunch. He remained untouched by the influence of the Congress party, trusting no one who he believed was under British influence. When Congress adopted a policy of appeasing Muslims, Savarkar staunchly opposed it. This eventually led him to join the Hindu Mahasabha, a move that separated him from both Gandhi and Nehru. Gandhi, a proponent of ahimsa, and Nehru, a secularist and the future Prime Minister, had concerns about Savarkar's methods and political beliefs.
Contrast in Stances
While Gandhi and Nehru were integral in shaping independent India, their approaches differed significantly when it came to Savarkar. Dr. Dhananjay Keer, a Padmashree awardee, noted in his official biography on Savarkar that Gandhiji refused to even share a stage with Savarkar in 1957, a gesture that underscores their ideological divergence. Additionally, Nehru, who considered Savarkar a political opponent, did not hesitate to publicly denounce him.
Legacy and Controversies
The legacy of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar remains a contentious subject. While some hail him as a national hero due to his commitment to the Hindu cause and his opposition to the partition of India, others criticize him for his alleged activities. This article aims to provide a balanced view of Savarkar and the role of his contemporaries, particularly Gandhi and Nehru, in shaping the post-independence India.
Conclusion
It is evident that the relationship between Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru was marred by ideological differences. While Savarkar remained steadfast in his beliefs and actions, Gandhi and Nehru took positions that were incompatible with his vision. This divergence of views did not diminish the contributions of Savarkar to Indian nationalism but did cast a shadow on his interactions with key figures of the independence movement.