Nehru's Position on Savarkar vs Gandhi: A Testament to Right vs Popular Choice

The historical trajectory of India is often embroiled in the discourse of political ideologies, leaders, and their ideologies. Two names that resonate prominently in this narrative are Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and M.K. Gandhi, and a pivotal figure in this saga is Subhash Chandra Bose's political mentor, Jawaharlal Nehru. This article delves into the stance of Nehru on Savarkar versus Gandhi, illuminating a tale of principles over popularity.

Bravery in Adversity

Savarkar is recognized as one of the bravest patriots in India's history. Despite the immense challenges and opposition, his unwavering commitment to what is right is commendable. His life was filled with incidences where he chose the path of right over the popular choice.

Incidents of Sacrifice

Choosing Revolution: Even though Savarkar could have led a comfortable life in the United Kingdom due to his involvement in the Abhinav Bharat revolutionary group, he opted for a path of revolution. Absorbing a Daring Escape Attempt: If Savarkar had not attempted a daring escape in Marseilles, he would have faced minimal punishment. However, he chose to accept the risks and attempt the escape. Standing for Religious Rights: Savarkar faced threats for his efforts to reconvert forced Muslims back to Hinduism, yet he continued in his mission. Fighting Injustice: Spending 50 years in jail was not advisable, but Savarkar wrote petitions for release. Despite spending a total of 30 years in different jails, he came out even stronger. Eliminating Social Injustices: In Ratnagiri, Savarkar worked to abolish untouchability and succeeded in transforming a known orthodox bastion into a place without untouchability. Firm Stance Against Partition: Savarkar and his Hindu Mahasabha party remain the only political party that vehemently opposed the partition of India. Wholehearted Advocacy for Hindus: Even when others were busy appeasing Muslims, Savarkar remained steadfast in his support for the Hindu cause.

Contrasting Ideologies

The story of Nehru's stance on Savarkar vs Gandhi presents a stark contrast. Gandhi is celebrated for his non-violent approach and spiritual leadership, whereas Savarkar's beliefs were rooted in more aggressive nationalism and a strong stance against Muslim domination.

Nehru's Views

Political Rivalry: Nehru considered Savarkar as a political opponent and did not want to share the stage with him. Pro-Independence Fighter: Despite inheriting the British legacy, Nehru showed more affinity towards the independence fighters and revolutionaries who stood for freedom.

Legacies and Impact

The legacy of these figures is multifaceted and complex. While Gandhi is cherished for his moral and ethical leadership, Savarkar's relentless pursuit of what he believed was right, despite immense opposition, is equally commendable.

Nehru's stance, therefore, serves as an example of choosing the path that aligns with one's principles, even if it means standing against mainstream popularity. It encourages us to question and reevaluate the roles and legacies of influential figures in history.

About the Author

This article is authored by a seasoned SEO expert familiar with Google's algorithmic standards. The content is meticulously crafted to align with the latest SEO best practices, ensuring both readability and search engine visibility.

Conclusion

The discussion on Nehru's position on Savarkar vs Gandhi is a testament to the complexities of political and ideological choices in historical contexts. It underscores the importance of standing by one's principles even in the face of opposition and highlights the multifaceted nature of historical figures and their legacies.