The Deceptive Power of Government-Designed Metrics: The Case of 'Cases' in COVID-19

Contemporary discussions often highlight the pervasive influence of government and its operations on public perception. In the context of the ongoing pandemic, one can argue that the government has employed a specific brainwashing technique, subtly manipulating the public's view of the virus through carefully crafted metrics. Among these, the term 'cases' stands as a prime example of this deceptive power.

Brainwashing Techniques in Government Actions

The passage provided offers a compelling critique of governmental actions and their underlying manipulative nature. Author Anonymous (referenced as 'email sez') argues that the concept of 'government' is a mere diversion, designed to shield private sector interests from public wrath. This notion suggests that governmental entities exist as convenient scapegoats for the actions of corporations, deflecting blame and responsibility from those who truly hold the power.

Furthermore, the author challenges the very idea of 'government' as a benevolent entity that maintains public order. They posit that government serves primarily as an opaque cover for private sector interests, undermining democratic processes through judicial and legislative avenues. This manipulation ensures that while citizens engage in legal debates and calls for reforms, the same corrupt practices continue unabated.

The Psychological Impact of 'Cases'

The slippery slope of government-mandated metrics reaches its peak in how 'cases' are portrayed in the pandemic context. These metrics are more than mere figures; they are designed to elicit fear and create a narrative of constant danger. The term 'cases' is ambiguous and carries a connotation of an ever-growing menace, akin to a gigantic snowball rolling down a hill.

This careful structuring of information instills a sense of urgency and terror, eroding individual autonomy and encouraging compliance. It effectively brainwashes the public into seeing 'cases' not as static indicators, but as fluid, expanding threats. To combat this, Anonymous suggests paying attention to more meaningful metrics, such as deaths per 100,000 people, as reported by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

Addressing the Deception

The CDC's data and graphs, particularly those showing 'Deaths per 1000000 People,' provide a far more accurate and less alarmist picture of the pandemic's impact. By breaking down this data, the government can reveal significant disparities in death rates across different regions, shedding light on the true scope of the crisis.

Such transparency would not only challenge the existing narrative but also foster a more informed and resilient public. By empowering individuals with accurate information, the government can help create a more educated and proactive citizenry, capable of making informed decisions and holding those in power accountable.

Conclusion

The manipulation of metrics like 'cases' by government bodies serves a dual purpose: it both distracts the public and maintains the current power structures. By critically examining and questioning these metrics, we can resist the brainwashing and work towards a more transparent and informed society. The pandemic has uncovered the depth of governmental manipulation, urging us to demand more honest and holistic representations of public health crises.