The Misconceptions and Facts Around Joe Biden's Role in Ukraine's Prosecutor Firing

Recent claims and discussions regarding the actions of Joe Biden during his visit to Ukraine have sparked controversy and misinformation. This article aims to present the factual evidence and timeline of events to separate the truth from these misconceptions.

State Department Briefing Memo

Before embarking on his trip to Ukraine, Vice President Biden was provided with a State Department briefing memo. According to the memo, the corrupt prosecutor, who was not investigating the Burisma company, was removed from his position to ensure proper accountability and investigation.

No Fact-Check Needed

Claims that the firing of the corrupt prosecutor was in any way a quid pro quo for aid to Ukraine are baseless. The State Department has consistently stated that such allegations have no factual basis. This has been true every time these claims have been made.

Corrective Action Taken

When the corrupt prosecutor refused to investigate Burisma, the Obama administration took decisive action. Vice President Biden, among other officials, worked to have the prosecutor removed. After the new prosecutor assumed office, Burisma was indeed investigated.

Universal Praise and Acknowledgment

This action by Vice President Biden was widely recognized and praised across Europe. It garnered significant media attention and was considered a significant achievement of his tenure. The reversal of the corrupt prosecutor's inaction had a positive impact on the integrity of the investigation.

Corruption Allegations

The claims that the investigation of corruption involved Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, and his connection to the Burisma board, are misguided. While it is true that Hunter Biden served on Burisma's board, the removal of the corrupt prosecutor was not in any way motivated by Hunter's personal connections. The focus was on ensuring proper investigation and accountability.

Vice President Biden's Role

Vice President Biden, on behalf of the United States and the European Union, played a crucial role in pressuring Ukraine to take action against the corrupt prosecutor. This action was taken because the corrupt prosecutor was not investigating Burisma. A foreclosed investigation due to the inaction of a corrupt prosecutor would have been a liability.

Timeline and Accuracy

The timeline of events clearly shows that the corrupt prosecutor was not investigating Burisma at the time. The video of Joe Biden discussing the fact that the prosecutor was fired shows a factual and accurate account of the situation. There is no conspiracy; the goal was to ensure proper investigation and hold those accountable for any improprieties.

Conclusion

The actions taken by Vice President Joe Biden and the international community to ensure proper investigation and accountability in Ukraine were based on factual evidence and good governance principles. It is important to rely on accurate information and avoid spreading misinformation that undermines the integrity of such actions.